Hi Dennis,
Thank you very much for your inputs on this. I may conact you If I need any
futher help.
Thanks again.
Thanks,
Srini
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> Hi Srini,
>
> Metro has a small performance advantage over CXF and Axis2, though that's
> mostly significant
Hi Srini,
Metro has a small performance advantage over CXF and Axis2, though
that's mostly significant for small messages. Generally the performance
with large messages is going to be more of a concern, and there the
three are pretty close (as long as WS-Security isn't involved).
Personally,
Hi;
Metro can also work with .NET clients. I had no hands on experience with
Metro but my firends are using it with .NET clients.
I had .NET clients and my services were handled by Axis2. There was no
problem also. Axis2 was doing well.
So reading the system requirements can also be a point for
Hi Dennis,
Thank you very much for the details that you provided. When we reviewed your
article, it seems Metro is good in performance point of view - compare to
CXF and Axis2. Do you suggest to go with Metro? At this point of time we are
looking for the best one in overall performance and impleme
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
...
My IBM developerWorks series on Java Web Services
(http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/views/java/libraryview.jsp?search_by=java+web+services:)
has details on the configuration issues and performance (though the
main performance article on CXF seems to be missing in t
Hi Srini,
If you're not using WS-Security the two stacks each have some advantages
and disadvantages. The main difference on the client side is that CXF is
best used with the JAX-WS frontend, which means you need to have access
to the WSDL at runtime (since that's how JAX-WS handles configurat
Hi;
These were the questions I had asked before using Axis2 and now I'm happy
with Axis2 using ADB
Here is a nice post about CFX and Axis2 performance:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jws14/index.html
And here is another good benchmarking about binding methods (for the other
que
CXF is certainly easy to use and very fast to get up and running.
Ron
On 22/06/2010 11:56 AM, Srinivasa K wrote:
Hi,
We are trying to migrate to Axis2 and also considering CXF. Could
anybody provide advantages of CXF over Axis2?
And, which one is the best in peformance view?
Appreciate your h
Hi,
We are trying to migrate to Axis2 and also considering CXF. Could anybody
provide advantages of CXF over Axis2?
And, which one is the best in peformance view?
Appreciate your help on this.
Thanks,
Srini
