Hi,
i want to return the Hits!! For listing them out!
But i get this Exception!
Exception in thread "main" java.io.IOException: Das Handle ist ungültig
at java.io.RandomAccessFile.seek(Native Method)
at
org.apache.lucene.store.FSInputStream.readInternal(FSDirectory.java:415)
Maik Schreiber wrote:
I'm running XML-RPC to allow access to the index.
My idea was that I share a SecretKey between the projects indexers and
projects clients. So the indexer can only add/remove documents with
his key and the client can only access documents with his key.
In our projects w
> Is any of the authentication incredentials actually put into the index
> for this verifyication?
No. We're using authentication only to protect the HTTP interface, but you can
search for about anything once you're past that.
> Currently, I also store the SecretKey (hash of it) in the index so I
Keep the IndexSearcher object you used to get the Hits open until you have
finished with them...
Luc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 1 september 2005 10:14
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Can't return Hits!
Hi,
i want to r
Maik Schreiber wrote:
Currently, I also store the SecretKey (hash of it) in the index so I
know when e.g. the request comes to delete all documents I also which ones.
I'm not sure if you're talking about authentication for using the XML-RPC
interface here...?
Multiple users can authenticate t
> Multiple users can authenticate to the XML-RPC server but also have
> access to different documents inside lucene.
>
> So I need some information in the lucene index to know which ones the
> users is able to access. Currently I generate a MD5 hash of the
> username/password and store this as Fie
If I do a proximity search "terma termb"~10 that will get me the documents that
have terma within 10 words of termb. But how can I get all the terms
> that are within x number of
> terms of given query terms.
instead of just the documents.
Thanks,
Andrew
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Ben,
Yes -- I would prefer to let the OS handle his, especially if it can
save me some coding. Is there is a way (under linux) to limit a
certain process's disk utilization? It seems like nice(1) just
modifies the scheduling priority, I'm assuming this means CPU
scheduling. In my case, I'm t
Try this: (CFQ) I/O scheduler
http://lwn.net/Articles/57732/
Rajesh Munavalli
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Lamprecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 4:00 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: IO bandwidth throttling
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Ye
Chris Lamprecht wrote:
> I've wanted something similar, for the same purpose -- to keep lucene
> from consuming disk I/O resources when another process is running on
> the same machine.
Sorry for jumping in (I'm a Lucene newb) but isn't this better handled
by the OS? On a Unix box I would just ren
Ben Gollmer wrote:
>Chris Lamprecht wrote:
>
>
>>I've wanted something similar, for the same purpose -- to keep lucene
>>from consuming disk I/O resources when another process is running on
>>the same machine.
>>
>>
>
>Sorry for jumping in (I'm a Lucene newb) but isn't this better handled
>
Hallo everybody,
I am beginning with Lucene. I tested the Webdemo described in the Book on my
HomePC. When I upload it on a webserver, this example works but he doesn't find
any keyword, the result of every search is null results. I have uploaded the
same index consists of 3files deleta
On Aug 30, 2005, at 9:53 PM, Friedland, Zachary (EDS - Strategy) wrote:
> > * I'm interested in implementing a "dynamic filter" component
> > that will walk through the hits[] object and pull out distinct
> > values for certain fields to display as search-within-a-search
> > options (all of them w
Rajesh Munavalli wrote:
> Try this: (CFQ) I/O scheduler
> http://lwn.net/Articles/57732/
>
> Rajesh Munavalli
>
The CFQ scheduler is the default in Red Hat Enterprise 4 and recent
Fedoras (3 and 4 IIRC). My FC4 system is usable even with processes like
'updatedb' running.
http://www.redhat.com
Hi,
We are running into performace problem as we use lucene. Everything worked
fine till yesterday and today when we starte performance testing we saw an
error. Here are the details of the error
54eda4e1 SystemErr R From Faceted SearchImpl rlinksIndexReader.open(dir)
failed
[9/1/05 17
How many files are in the index directory?
If your index is not optimized, try optimizing it first?
What's the max number of open files (ulimit -a)? If it looks low,
increase it.
It looks like you have 20+ fields. How many fields have you got? (just
curious)
It looks like you are not using the co
This is discussed extensively in the FAQ...
Why am I getting an IOException that says "Too many open files"?
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ#head-48921635adf2c968f7936dc07d51dfb40d638b82
: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
: From: "jaina (sent by Nabble.com)" <[
Thanks Otis for your questions. Here are the answers... Please let me know
your thoughts
We do optimize() after indexWrite.
The maximum open file allowed is 2,000. Is this normal, too small? What is your
recommended number ? We have 57 index files, how many files that Lucene index
will a
Thanks Chris. We are looking at it and have tried few of those things. Will
let you know once we have tried all of them.
Thanks again.
--
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com:
http://www.nabble.com/Too-many-open-files-when-doing-performance-testing-t272369.html#a766965
Hi,
2000 doesn't sound very high. I've used much higher values. Because
you have so many fields and files, you may want to increase it. If you
have Lucene in Action, we have a formula in there for calculating the
number of open files used (section 2.7, according to
http://www.lucenebook.com/sea
hi all,
even i am getting similar error. i found that it is because of
unsorted index..anybody has idea about it?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Gasi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 2:45 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: nul
Actually, we might not be able to change the setting as we are using a shared server and are not allowed to change system settings. What other things can we look at to get this fixed?
Akhil Jain
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/01/2005 09
Use that compound index format and use a single IndexSearcher instance.
Otis
--- Akhil Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Actually, we might not be able to change the setting as we are using
> a
> shared server and are not allowed to change system settings. What
> other
> things
23 matches
Mail list logo
