Re: Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5

2006-06-17 Thread Paul Borgermans
Here 1.5, on SuSE Linux x86_64 Tx Paul On 6/16/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello everyone, If you have 15 seconds to spare, please let us (Lucene developers) know which version of Java you are using with Lucene: 1.4 or 1.5 All it takes is 1 click on one of the two choice

Re: Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5

2006-06-17 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Lucene.NET is not dead (it's developing in Apache incubator) at all. Otis - Original Message From: typeseven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 11:10:18 AM Subject: Re: Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5 On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:48:15 -0700

Re: Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5

2006-06-17 Thread typeseven
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:10:18 +0200, typeseven wrote: > p.s. Or is Lucene.NET not dead after all? I just found out that there in fact are active lucene-net mailinglists: consider the p.s. question answered. /d - To unsubscribe,

Re: Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5

2006-06-17 Thread typeseven
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:48:15 -0700 (PDT), Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Hello everyone, > > If you have 15 seconds to spare, please let us (Lucene developers) know which > version of Java you are using with Lucene: 1.4 or 1.5 > > All it takes is 1 click on one of the two choices: > http://www.qui

RE: indexing emails

2006-06-17 Thread Rob Staveley (Tom)
Having spent a lot of time getting this wrong myself in an e-mail indexer(!), I urge you to consider whether in your query interface you will need to look for mail to "john*" rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED], because "john*" may have been addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you inde