Re: Lucene 2.0.1 release date

2006-10-25 Thread Chris Hostetter
: The point is that releases are not planned ahead of time, so we can : never tell which files that have been modified between, say, X.Y and : X.Y.Z release. We know that only when the release is made. In short, that's not entirely true ... it's very easy to determine exactly what has changed b

Analyzer.getPositionIncrementGap question

2006-10-25 Thread qaz zaq
I have multiple values want to add to the same FIELD, and I also want to add non-zero but NON CONSTANT position increment gap among those values. e.g., gap between "value1" and "value2" is 10, but gap between "value2" and "value3" is 100. is there any how can I achieve that? d.add(new Fie

Re: Lucene 2.0.1 release date

2006-10-25 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
George, You may want to subscribe to java-dev or just look through the java-dev archives to see how Lucene releases come about. Let me try re-enacting it. dev 1: What do people think about a X.Y release? group: Sure, why not, looks like we have enough changes, some bug fixes, some performance

RE: Lucene 2.0.1 release date

2006-10-25 Thread George Aroush
Hi Steven and all, (Sorry for the late response.) This is all fine, but here is my problem with not having a way of knowing what makes up 2.0.1. I have ported 2.0 from Java to C#. I used the packaged (ZIP download) of Lucene 2.0 as my port point. Now, it's time for me to port 2.0.1 to C#. To

Re: experiences with lingpipe

2006-10-25 Thread Breck Baldwin
Martin Braun wrote: Hi Breck, thanks for your answer. What about performance? Tuning params dominate the performance space. A small beam (16 active hypotheses) will be quite snappy (I have 200 queries/sec with a 32 beam. over a 80 gig text collection that with some pruning was 5 gig in

Re: java.io.WriteAbortedException: writing aborted; java.io.NotSerializableException: org.apache.lucene.queryParser.Token

2006-10-25 Thread Doron Cohen
Hi Eugene, If the query parser (from some reason) throws a ParseException, and the RMI layer attempts to marshal/serialize that exception, there would probably be an issue because although ParseException is serializable (as all throwables) it has a Token data member, which is not serializable. Can

Re: experiences with lingpipe

2006-10-25 Thread Martin Braun
Hi Breck, thanks for your answer. >> >> With lucenes spellcheck contribution I am not really satisfied because >> the Index has some (many?) mispelled words, so the did you mean class >> (from the jave.net example) is good in finding similar mispelled words. >> With the similarWords Function the

Re: number of term occurrences

2006-10-25 Thread beatriz ramos
Thank you I had forgotten "Field.TermVector.YES" when I created the new Field On 24/10/06, Samir Abdou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, You indexed without storing vectors! This is why the term vector is null. Samir -Message d'origine- De: Paz Belmonte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Env

java.io.WriteAbortedException: writing aborted; java.io.NotSerializableException: org.apache.lucene.queryParser.Token

2006-10-25 Thread Eugeny N Dzhurinsky
Hi there! I'm trying to implement a service, which is doing search on Lucene index. This service contains a method returning List of Integer values, and takes custom object as a parameter. All objects passing to this service are serializable, but for some reason when executing this code Query inc