Thanks again.
I wasn't aware of the problematic part with updating posts. Sorry for that,
and thanks for the answer.
Good day.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FuzzyLikeThisQuery-what-does-maxNumTerms-mean-tf3716547.html#a10407540
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing l
Laxmilal - this could be a left-over lock. Try removing it "manually" and
re-running your search app.
Otis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: Laxmilal Menaria <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello,
I would like to ask you about the function add of lucene 2.0. When i am
trying to add a document in an existed index the index's documents are replaced
by the new document. I did it according to the book.
cheers,
Stefanos
-
> Dawid Weiss wrote:
> > You could also try splitting the document into paragraphs and use Carrot2's
> > Lingo algorithm (www.carrot2.org) on a paragraph-level to extract clusters.
> > Labelling routine in Lingo should extract 'key' phrases; this analysis is
> > heavily frequency-based, but... y
Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>
> : If i rememebr correctly (you'll have to test this) sorting on a field
> : which doesn't exist for every doc does what you would want (docs with
> : values are listed before docs without)
>
> : The actual behavior is different than described above. I modified
> :
bhecht wrote:
Thanks Mark,
I have updated my previous post I guess, before you had a chance to read it.
Did you edit your post on Nabble? That edit didn't come through as a
message to java-user so I didn't see it.
You shouldn't need to call rewrite on your FuzzyLikeThisQuery unless you
wan
: I have updated my previous post I guess, before you had a chance to read it.
: Can you please re-read my post again?
: Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
please do not "update" posts ... independent of any features that third
party companies may provide for a
I opened an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-877
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 1:37 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Locking in Lucene 2.1
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 21:18, Andreas Guther wro
John Powers wrote:
Lucene 1.4 is what I use for the application and how I compile things
But in the help/about it says "null"
And I usually use the webstart, ya. But I've tried from a downloaded
jar as well. and I'm using java1.6 from sun
Ah, all is clear now. Luke will not work with Lucene <
Lucene 1.4 is what I use for the application and how I compile things
But in the help/about it says "null"
And I usually use the webstart, ya. But I've tried from a downloaded
jar as well. and I'm using java1.6 from sun
-Original Message-
From: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Powers wrote:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: IMPL
at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredField(Unknown Source)
That's a strange one ... Which version of Lucene are you using with Luke
(you can check this in Help -> About box, look for "Lucene version:").
Are you running this from Java We
Thanks Mark,
I have updated my previous post I guess, before you had a chance to read it.
Can you please re-read my post again?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FuzzyLikeThisQuery-what-does-maxNumTerms-mean-tf3716547.html#a10402974
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users
The shortlisting isn't based on stop words - a score is produced to
prioritise term selections. The score uses the IDF (inverse document
frequency) of the original term and mixes in the "edit-distance" for
each of the fuzzy variations of original terms. Care is taken to ensure
that in the query
java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: IMPL
at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredField(Unknown Source)
at org.getopt.luke.Luke.openDirectory(Unknown Source)
at org.getopt.luke.Luke.openIndex(Unknown Source)
at org.getopt.luke.Luke.openOk(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.Nati
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 21:18, Andreas Guther wrote:
> Do I miss something here or is the documentation not updated?
Looks like that part of the documentation isn't up-to-date. The file is
called write.lock and it's stored in the index directory. Could you file
an issue so the documentation ge
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 16:17, John Powers wrote:
> Yes, it doesn't work. it gives an error modal dialog box that says
> "IMPL".
Is there a more useful error message when you start Luke from the command
line and try to open the index?
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
---
Thanks Mark for the detailed explanation.
So one more question if I may:
How is the list shortened to to include terms only?
In your example you had 2 stop words which of course are not included in the
token stream.
But what happens if you get more than maxNumTerms terms, how are the
maxNumTerms
I am in the process to migrate from Lucene 2.0 to Lucene 2.1.
>From reading the Changes document I understand that the write locks are
now written into the index folder instead of the java.io.tmpdir.
In the "Apache Lucene - Index File Formats" document in section "6.2
Lock File" I read that ther
: - Use an IndexEverythingAnalyzer for writing,
: so "werk", "werkte", "gewerkt" and "en" is indexed as-is when they are
: encountered.
:
: - And then use a DutchAnalyzer for reading,
: which if I ask "werk" searches for "werk", "werkte" and "gewerkt",
: and also ignores stop words like "en" in th
Well, I don't see how this can work. In your example, you'd
index "werkte". But how are you going to search such that
this matches "werk"? No matter what analyzers you use? It looks
like you're thinking about either stemming or wildcarding, but
I really suspect that stemming is language dependent.
FuzzyLikeThis is effectively the same as MoreLikeThis but adds fuzzy variations
for the selected terms.
>>Will it only use the first 3 terms or what?
It works the same way as MoreLikeThis in that it is selective about which input
terms are used for querying - words like "the" will typically get
The ~ syntax can only be applied to a single phrase, i.e. "the greate
one"~3. This sets the slop allowed for the phrase to be 3. The defintion of
slop can be found by searching the archive, but it will not easily allow for
what you are looking for. The Lucene query language has not yet recived Spa
Hello all,
I am new to lucene and want to use the FuzzyLikeThisQuery.
I have read the documentation for this class, and read the following for
what maxNumTerms means:
"maxNumTerms - The total number of terms clauses that will appear once
rewritten as a BooleanQuery".
In addition in the classes d
We 'd use a different index for each locale's language that is
configured, however this might have an impact on performance.
Would this be attainable (maybe some day in lucene)?
- Use an IndexEverythingAnalyzer for writing,
so "werk", "werkte", "gewerkt" and "en" is indexed as-is when they are
Yes, it doesn't work. it gives an error modal dialog box that says
"IMPL".
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 4:45 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: search problem/odd results
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 23:42, John
According to the documentation for Lucene's Query Parser Syntax, the
tilde operator provides a proximity search.
For instance, "Harry Hallows"~6 should match the text 'Harry Potter
and the Deathly Hallows'.
And while this is fine for two token phrases, I was wondering if it
worked well for subex
Hi Eric,
On May 9, 2007, at 2:39 AM, supereric wrote:
How I can get the tag word score in lucene. suppose that you have
searched a
tag word and 3 hit documents
are now found.
1 -How someone could find number of occurrences in any document so
it could
sort the results.
Span Queries tell
27 matches
Mail list logo
