Hey thanks Eric.
This should help me.
--Regards
Rakesh S
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:31:32 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Using multiple filters
>
> You have to put lucene-misc.jar (which you should have in your
> lucene/contrib/misc directory
Folks,
We're running into some performance bottle neck issues while running lucene
search against our indices (approx 1.5 GB in size after optimization), and
the search query seems to block on a sychronized read as follows. Obviously we
can upgrade to the latest as a first step. When Tomcat r
Taking a guess here, I think this question could be rephrased as ...
Is there an OSGi bundle(s) the exposes the Lucene APIs and is available
in a Maven repository?
For OSGi stuff, check out the Eclipse Orbit project [1], which wraps up
third-party libraries into OSGi bundles and there is a Lucene
Mark and Steven, thanks for the link. It's very helpful. And, sorry for
overlooking mark's reply.
Ted
- Original Message
From: Steven A Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2008 12:44:14 PM
Subject: RE: boost scores with non-content base
Hi all,
Would this approach be recommended for stemmed words as well. For example
let say the original word is
'mower', I want matches on 'mow', 'mowing' and 'mowers' but the most
relevance would obviously be matches
for 'mower'. Should I index my documents unstemmed and then stem at the
query wor
My initial concern was not about efficiency , but that using xml to
make code more generic results in far from from elegant if/else
checks for each of Field.Store , Field.Index , Field.TermVector. I'd
prefer suggested way to make initial preparations to create the maps
and then have an assignm
Sorry. Anyway, back on track.
On Jan 3, 2008 3:25 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : Ummm, Chris, I don't know why you posted this here. We're all on
> : track as far as I can tell. Or is this a trap to say that I have
> : changed the subject and am now talking about thread hija
Hi Ted,
On 01/03/2008 at 3:35 PM, Ted Chen wrote:
> I'd like to make sure that my search engine can take into
> account of some non-content based factors.
[snip]
> P.S. My last email didn't get any response.
Au contraire, mon frère:
http://www.nabble.com/modify-search-result-scores-td14588970.h
Hi,
I'd like to make sure that my search engine can take into account of some
non-content based factors. For example, I'd like to give more score to popular
docs based on # of views each document had. Another example would be to return
results with search history (e.g. if we found that mos
: Ummm, Chris, I don't know why you posted this here. We're all on
: track as far as I can tell. Or is this a trap to say that I have
: changed the subject and am now talking about thread hijacking? But, I
: suppose that would have been you. ;-)
This is my standard reply to anyone (i notice) wh
: To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Doubts about indexing the localhost ROOT using Dutch 0.8.1
:
: Hello everyone,
:
: I'm seeing the tutorial about Dutch WebSearcher in this URL:
: http://peterpuwang.googlepages.com/NutchGuideForDummies.htm
I'm not sure what "Dutch" is, but your quest
Ummm, Chris, I don't know why you posted this here. We're all on
track as far as I can tell. Or is this a trap to say that I have
changed the subject and am now talking about thread hijacking? But, I
suppose that would have been you. ;-)
Briggs.
On Jan 3, 2008 2:10 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL
: Is there a mavenized Eclipse bundle that exposes the Lucene API?
there might be ... it depends on what a "mavenized Eclipse bundle" is.
(googling for those keywords turns up this exact question, and a bunch of
threads/docs on building ecplise plugins with maven ... so i'm really not
sure wha
IMHO it would be nice if Lucene's Similarity formula took the
indexed-date of the document into account. Ideally as an optional
setting, where the user can provide a date field as well.
Some of the other search engines do - for example Fast's Instream. It
makes sense that as documents age over t
Is there a mavenized Eclipse bundle that exposes the Lucene API?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Eclipse-bundle-tp14603460p14603460.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: Subject: Suggested number of fields limit per Index
: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing mess
wow
I found the error, I have to http://localhost/MyWebSite/index.jsp into the
Urls´s txt file... the dutch does not fond the JSP files starting /ROOT/ ...
I need to put /ROOT/Index.jsp ..
Well, thanks anyway ;-D
On Jan 3, 2008 3:44 PM, Jesiel Trevisan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello eve
Is there a mavenized eclipse bundle out there?
Steven Rowe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's in the global maven repo at:
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/
>
> The 2.2.0 core jar is at:
>
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/2.2.0/
>
> Steve
>
> On 01/03/
My suggestion would be:
An "all" field that captures all your attributes and allows for
generic, easy search across all products. Additionally, go ahead and
index all your fields per documents. Then, for your default search,
use the all field. _IF_ you know what category of products you a
You have to put lucene-misc.jar (which you should have in your
lucene/contrib/misc directory
Erick
On Jan 3, 2008 10:56 AM, Rakesh Shete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is the link I found on googgling:
>
>
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_2_0/api/org/apache/lucene/misc/ChainedFilter.html
>
Thank all of your guys that made suggestions. I greatly appreciate them.
Our issue is that, our data have the notion of family, for example, a
Product family could contains products like TV, Car, DVD, etc. Of
course, each individual set of the product would have its own set of
definition - which c
Another issues is how to generate queries. If you have hundreds of
fields, you may have to generate queries (e.g. using the
MultfieldQueryParser) across all those fields just to find documents
that _could_ have those fields. This can lead to the dreaded
TooManyClausesException.
That bei
Hello everyone,
I'm seeing the tutorial about Dutch WebSearcher in this URL:
http://peterpuwang.googlepages.com/NutchGuideForDummies.htm
I'm using ducth version 0.8.1 and JVM 1.4.2
I have some doubts about it, for example:
I'm trying to index http://localhost/MyWebSite/ ... but I could do it
b
Yeah, I forgot to mention that the stuff on the apache site is the 2.3
development stuff. Sorry about that. Heh, I forgot that it was
actually out on the maven mirrors and such. Doh!
On Jan 3, 2008 11:42 AM, Steven A Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's in the global maven repo at:
>
>
I'll give a quick opinion, and remember that is all it is.
Without more information of the types of documents your are storing, I
would say you are definitely going in the wrong direction. In my
opinion, an index should describe the common attributes of all the
documents it contains. You should
One thing to watch out for is the "norms" overhead which is one byte per field,
per document. These are byte arrays used in scoring to account for the length
of fields in individual documents.
With hundreds of fields and millions of documents this can eat up memory.
The good news is you can opt
I have been searching online could not find an exact answer; and
wondering if anyone here knows whether there is a preferred max number
of fields limit in lucene index?
We are in the process of deciding how our index would look like in our
lucene integration. For one of our approach, we could have
Hi,
It's in the global maven repo at:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/
The 2.2.0 core jar is at:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/2.2.0/
Steve
On 01/03/2008 at 11:26 AM, tgospodinov wrote:
>
> I couldn't find the url to the lucene maven repo if ther
Look at the news section for december 24:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html
It's @ http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/lucene/
On Jan 3, 2008 11:26 AM, tgospodinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I couldn't find the url to the lucene maven repo if there's on
I couldn't find the url to the lucene maven repo if there's one. There is an
old version in the glabal maven repo (1.4.2, i think), but I need 2.2.0.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-a-mavenized-Lucene-bundle-in-the-apache-maven-repo-and-what%27s-the-url--t
Here is the link I found on googgling:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_2_0/api/org/apache/lucene/misc/ChainedFilter.html
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Using multiple filters
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 21:24:35 +0530
>
>
> Hi Eric, Mark,
>
> I am usin
Hi Eric, Mark,
I am using Lucene 2.2.0 and I dont see anything like ChainedFilter or
BooleanFilter. Is that not supported now?
Googling on it I found that the ChainedFilter is in some *misc* package. So I
believe it has either been dropped or not shipped with the official version.
-- Regards,
Filters are certainly a valid way to go. There are other approaches that
have been discussed at length on the user list. Here's a link to a
searchable
user-list archive...
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/
I'm certain that there are examples there.
Best
Erick
On Jan 3, 200
I am using a boolean query that is composed of wildcard queries that have *
around each search term (*search* and *term*). Is there another way to
achieve the same result and stay away from wildcards? Thanks for the help.
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> See Lucene In Action, well worth it even if it
Do you have any evidence at all that this is worth the effort? I assume
that you're worried about efficiency. In my experience, this is *very*
often a mis-placed concern. And "efficient" code that saves, say,
even 1% of my run time is *not* worth the hours/days/weeks spent
creating and *maintaining
Thanks Grant,
I was no access this site in this morning, but now I get this information.
Tks.
On Jan 3, 2008 10:27 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have a look at Nutch: http://lucene.apache.org/nutch
>
> -Grant
>
> On Jan 3, 2008, at 6:21 AM, Jesiel Trevisan wrote:
>
> > Hi ev
Have a look at Nutch: http://lucene.apache.org/nutch
-Grant
On Jan 3, 2008, at 6:21 AM, Jesiel Trevisan wrote:
Hi everyone, I need some websearch functions, like Spider, than, I
will use
the Nutch API´s
I would like to know witch JVM version support run the nutch
I got the Nutch release 0
Hi everyone, I need some websearch functions, like Spider, than, I will use
the Nutch API´s
I would like to know witch JVM version support run the nutch
I got the Nutch release 0.9 and I´m seeing that support only JVM 1.5
I'm using the JVM 1.4.2 Does Nuch 0.8.1 work with it ?
Tks.
38 matches
Mail list logo
