Hi Chris and Mike,
Thanks for your help.
Chis you got me right for both points. Sorry that I could not put my queries
properly. As I can't set and get boost value I have to do my implementation
some other way. Please help me in the same
I have a three column table which I am trying to save i
Thanks ~ Yes it seems this would be quite difficult to achieve with
Lucene. Nevermind, I'll try to figure out a workaround for it.
Thanks for helping =)
Cedric
On Feb 16, 2008 5:30 AM, Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Cedric,
>
> I think I'm beginning to get the point of the [10/5/2
Mark,
Thanks for the quick fix. Actually, it is possible that there might
had been simultaneous queries using the MultiSearcher. I assumed it
was thread-safe, thus was re-using the same instance. I'll update my
application code as well.
Thanks,
-vivek
On Feb 15, 2008 5:56 PM, Mark Miller <[EMAIL
Mark,
Here is the scenario when I saw this exception,
1) A search was run which uses MultiSearcher. This search took more
than 3 mins to complete (due to index size and multiple indices)
2) Just a minute after the search was started, we started writing (in
a separate thread) to one of the index
Here is the fix: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1026
vivek sar wrote:
Mark,
There seems to be some issue with DefaultMultiIndexAccessor.java. I
got following NPE exception,
2008-02-13 07:10:28,021 ERROR [http-7501-Processor6] ReportServiceImpl -
java.lang.NullPointerExcep
Okay, sorry about this one vivek. Added to the unit tests to expose
this. When I took out the MultiSearcher caching, I kept the concept of
sharing a single MultiIndexAccessor. Unfortunately, this meant that
multiple threads were sharing the same Searcher to Accessor Map that was
used to track w
Hey vivek, sorry to hear you are having problems.
I am trying to figure out how you may be seeing this problem. The
IndexAccessor cannot return null because you would get an
IllegalStateException not a NullPointerException. Also, the released
MultiSearcher cannot be null because the Exception
Mark,
There seems to be some issue with DefaultMultiIndexAccessor.java. I
got following NPE exception,
2008-02-13 07:10:28,021 ERROR [http-7501-Processor6] ReportServiceImpl -
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.lucene.indexaccessor.DefaultMultiIndexAccessor.release(Defa
What the other posters are referring to is that you will have to
probably write some java code to do lucene indexing: you can get
access to your model objects (with all their dependent data) in java.
- since you are using hibernate, this shouild be easy- then create
lucene documents from your mode
Hi Cedric,
I think I'm beginning to get the point of the [10/5/2],
and why you called that requirement a bit strange, see below.
To use both normal position info and paragraph position info
you'll need two separate, one normal, and one for the paragraphs.
To use the normal field to determine the
Sorry, sent the previous draft email by mistake. Here is the correct one.
Sounds a typical SQL pivot problem.
select Id, SIN, data.*
from IdCard, (SELECT
ID
MAX(CASE WHEN name = 'Fname' THEN Value END) AS Fname,
MAX(CASE WHEN name = 'Lname' THEN Value END) AS Lname,
MAX(CA
Reading between the lines, I suspect two things are happening here, both
of which seems like missunderstandings ...
1) i think the IOException seen while debugging is refering to an
exception which is handled internally in Lucene and is not actually a
problem -- but Allahbaksh is seeing it whe
Allahbaksh Mohammedali Asadullah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Thanks for your valuable time.Could you get the same boost value what you
> had stored. In my case I always get boost value as 1 ie. Default value. When
> I debug it goes through IOException though it does not show any Exception
Thanks for your reply.
Your idea prompts more questions:
I understand what you are saying but don't know how to implement it. How do
you go about joining all rows of all the tables belonging to one person and
to index them so that I can actually use
"+Fname:john +County:USA" as a query?
Eric
To expand a bit on Chris's first point: Take off your DB hat and put on
your search hat . It sounds like you have simply moved your database
tables into Lucene and want to search across them. My rule is that
whenever you find yourself trying to make Lucene act like a DB, you
need to pause and refle
Hi, lmctndi,
You can liberate yourself from this complicated schema, and use some
SQLs to select out the content and put the data into one Lucene index.
You may need to avoid Hibernate Search here for your case, which limit
you to one way of organizing Lucene indexes. I do think this is where
DBS
Hi,
Thanks for your valuable time.Could you get the same boost value what you had
stored. In my case I always get boost value as 1 ie. Default value. When I
debug it goes through IOException though it does not show any Exception on the
console in eclipse.
Regards,
Allahbaksh
-Original Mes
I had to comment out the "search" lines.
But then when I run this I don't hit any exception. Tested on Linux
& Windows XP.
Mike
Allahbaksh Mohammedali Asadullah wrote:
Hi,
I am using lucene 2.3. The exception is properly handled when I run
the program by lucene but when I debug it it
Hi,
I am using lucene 2.3. The exception is properly handled when I run the program
by lucene but when I debug it it hit the exception at addDocuement.
Regards,
Allahbaksh
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.StringReader;
import org.apache.lucene.search.Hits;
import org.apache.luce
Which version of Lucene are you using?
Can you post the full stack trace for the exception you're hitting?
Mike
Allahbaksh Mohammedali Asadullah wrote:
Hi,
I am getting read past eof exception when I am adding Document.
The things works fine but while I read the Boost value I get it as
Hi all,
[ Sorry for the cryptic title but I can't think of a better one]
I am trying to integrate Lucene as a search engine for my database and would
appreciate some help on a problem.
First, some info about the development platform, I am developing on Windows
using Hibernate for DB transaction
Hi,
I am getting read past eof exception when I am adding Document. The things
works fine but while I read the Boost value I get it as default value i.e 1.0.
I tried using RAMDirectory then also I am getting the same error.
Can someone throw some light on this.
Warm Regards,
Allahbaksh
**
> You need to watch both the positionincrementgap
> (which, as I remember, gets added for each new field of the
> same name you add to the document). Make it 0 rather than
> whatever it is currently. You may have to create a new analyzer
> by subclassing your favorite analyzer and overriding the
>
You need to watch both the positionincrementgap
(which, as I remember, gets added for each new field of the
same name you add to the document). Make it 0 rather than
whatever it is currently. You may have to create a new analyzer
by subclassing your favorite analyzer and overriding the
getPositionI
Sergey Kabashnyuk wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:31:07 +0200, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK I found one case that can cause the assert to trip incorrectly.
Are you using empty string field names?
Not. May be empty content of the field.
Hmmm, ok. Empty content is fine
trying to send this again... i keep getting delivery failures so i've
attached my code snippet instead
My index from Luke looks like this where the columns are for
Rank/Field/Text
2 guid 2
1 guid pi1
1 statement Some policy statement for pi3, needs some text with a 2 in
it
1 guid pi3
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:31:07 +0200, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK I found one case that can cause the assert to trip incorrectly.
Are you using empty string field names?
Not. May be empty content of the field.
I have another question.
I see you use asserts in code 2.3.0
OK I found one case that can cause the assert to trip incorrectly.
Are you using empty string field names?
I'll open a Jira issue & fix it on the 2.3 branch (so this is fixed
in 2.3.1).
Thanks for reporting this!
Mike
Sergey Kabashnyuk wrote:
stack trace
java.lang.AssertionError
CheckIndex tool is in the 2.3 JAR. Just make sure the JAR is on your
CLASSPATH then run:
java org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex
However, from that stack trace, this is not a corruption issue in
your existing index. My guess is you would hit this same exception
if you started from a
Well, it seems that this may be a solution for me too.
But I'm afraid that someone one day will change this string. And then my app
will not work anymore...
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrian Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Freitag, 15. Februar 2008 13:02
> To: java-user@lucene
stack trace
java.lang.AssertionError
at
org.apache.lucene.index.TermInfosWriter.add(TermInfosWriter.java:143)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.appendPostings(DocumentsWriter.java:2290)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.writeSegment(DocumentsWriter.j
Can you provide the full stack trace, and any details of what you
were doing when you tripped that assert?
Another thing to try is to run the org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex
tool (new in 2.3) to check your 2.2 index. It's possible your 2.2
index has some undetected corruption which th
Hi
I want to update from lucene 2.2.0 to 2.3.0
but I have assert it TermInfosWriter line 143.
What is it mean
assert compareToLastTerm(fieldNumber, termText, termTextStart,
termTextLength) < 0 || (isIndex && termTextLength == 0 &&
lastTermTextLength == 0);
Can you help me?
Sergey Kabashnyuk
-
> > Document doc = new Document()
> > for (int i = 0; i < pages.length; i++) {
> > doc.add(new Field("text", pages[i], Field.Store.NO,
> > Field.Index.TOKENIZED));
> > doc.add(new Field("text", "$$", Field.Store.NO,
> > Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED));
> > }
>
> UN_TOKENIZED. Nice idea!
On Feb 14, 2008, at 3:44 AM, Cedric Ho wrote:
Anyway, I know my requirement is a bit strange, so it's ok if I can't
do this in Lucene. I'll settle with using a ThreadLocal to store the
[10/5/2] weighting and retrieve it in the Similarity.scorePayload(...)
function.
I don't think you are stil
> Document doc = new Document()
> for (int i = 0; i < pages.length; i++) {
> doc.add(new Field("text", pages[i], Field.Store.NO,
> Field.Index.TOKENIZED));
> doc.add(new Field("text", "$$", Field.Store.NO,
> Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED));
> }
UN_TOKENIZED. Nice idea!
I will check this
> Why not just use ?
Because nearly every analyzer removes it (SimpleAnalyzer, German, Russian,
French...)
Just tested it with luke in the search dialog.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
Hi,
I have a similar sitaution. I also considered using $. But for the sake of
not running into (potential) problems with Tokenisers, I just defined a
string in a config file which for sure is never going to occur in a document
and will never be searched for, e.g.
dfgjkjrkruigduhfkdgjrugr
Cheers
Hi Paul,
Do you mean the following?
e.g. to index this: "first second third forth fifth six"
originally it would be indexed as:
(first,0) (second,1) (third,2) (forth,3) (fifth,4) (six,5)
now it will be:
(first,0) (second,0) (third,0) (forth,1) (fifth,1) (six,1)
Then those Query classes that d
39 matches
Mail list logo
