Hi Grant,
you made mention of jackrabbit as example of storing data in lucene.
I did not find something like that in source-code. I found
LocalFileSystem and DatabaseFileSystem.
(I found lucene for indexing and searching.)
Have I overlooked something?
Best regards
Karsten
Grant
Antony Bowesman wrote:
Hi Mike,
Unfortunately you will have to delete the old doc, then reindex a
new doc, in order to change any payloads in the document's Tokens.
This issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1231
which is still in progress, could make updating stored (but
Hmmm, I thought it did. Can't say I've studied the code though, so
I'll take your word for it.
Never mind on the Jackrabbit suggestion :-)
Cheers,
Grant
On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:54 AM, Karsten F. wrote:
Hi Grant,
you made mention of jackrabbit as example of storing data in lucene.
I did
Excellent. And to confirm - my always-fails index load runs to
successful completion on this release.
Thanks Mike.
--
Ian.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Michael McCandless
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI -- there is a nasty bug that affects Lucene in Sun's 1.6 hotspot
compiler, starting
Excellent!
Thank you for originally raising this issue; I think you were first to
stumble on this unfortunate bug. Because you raised it here, and
iterated like crazy to narrow it down, we were able to eventually
track it down resolve it. Lucene progress would not happen without
such
which one will be the best to use as storage server. Lucene or Jackrabbit.
My requirement is to provide support to
1) Archive the documents
2) Do full text search on the documents.
3) Do backup the index store and archive store. [periodical basis]
4) Remove the documents after certain period
Hi Ganesh,
in this Thread nobody said, that lucene is a good storage server.
Only it could be used as storage server (Grant: Connect data storage with
simple, fast lookup and Lucene..)
I don't now about automatic rentention.
But for the rest in your list of features I suggest to take a deep
The best strategy.
Hello.
I want to ask you opinion about to How
store multiple fields of same document.
I see now two possibility's.
1. Multiple fields in document
2. One filed: for example named PROPERTIES, with multiple instances.
And values combined with name for example [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If essentially all you need is key-value storage, Berkeley DB for Java works
well. Lookup by ID is fast, can iterate through documents, supports
secondary keys, updates, etc.
Lucene would work relatively well for this, although inserting documents
might not be as fast, because segments need to
I'd go with option 1 unless and until you could demonstrate performance
problems. Speaking of which, you'd get a more informed answer if you
provided a bit more data, like how many fields are we talking, how many
documents, etc. If you're indexing 10,000 documents, go with the simplest.
If you're
Thank you Erick.
I'm talking about more then 10,000 documents and 95% less then 10 fields.
Maximum number of fields per document is unlimited.
But in practice it's no more the 20.
I'm interesting: does Lucene have any internal optimization,
which depend of the fields count or fields
: Or, to avoid the clause limit issue altogether, you could use a
: PrefixFilter instead of a QueryWrapperFilter around a
: {Wildcard,Prefix}Query:
right ... the missconception here seems to be that if you use a Filter,
all your Too Many Clauses problems are sovled -- but if that Filter is
Haven't a clue G.
Erick
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Sergey Kabashnyuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Thank you Erick.
I'm talking about more then 10,000 documents and 95% less then 10 fields.
Maximum number of fields per document is unlimited.
But in practice it's no more the 20.
I'm
I am out of the office until 2008-08-07..
I will take vacation and will not return until Aug.7. Raja (He Kun Wang)
will be my backup during my leave. I will check emails at night. For
anything emergent, you can call my cell phone (86) 131 6290 0375.
Note: This is an automated response to your
Hi,
I'm sometimes receiving FileNotFoundExceptions during indexing.
java.io.FileNotFoundException: /tmp/content/3615.0-3618.0/_3p.fnm (No such
file or directory)
at
com.test.vcssearch.DefaultServiceIndexer$2.run(DefaultServiceIndexer.java:245)
at
Are you only creating one instance of IndexManager and then sharing
that instance across all threads?
Can you put some logging/printing where you call IndexReader.unLock,
to see how often that's happening? That method is dangerous because
if you unlock a still-active IndexWriter it
Hello,
I'm trying to use SpanRegexQuery as one of the clauses in my SpanQuery.
When I give it a regex like: L[a-z]+ing and do a rewrite on the final
query I get terms like Labinger and Lackonsingh along with the expected
terms Labeling, Lacing, etc. It's as if the regex is treated as a
find()
Christopher M Collins wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to use SpanRegexQuery as one of the clauses in my SpanQuery.
When I give it a regex like: L[a-z]+ing and do a rewrite on the final
query I get terms like Labinger and Lackonsingh along with the expected
terms Labeling, Lacing, etc. It's as if the
Thanks Andy and Karsten.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: Using lucene as a database... good idea or bad idea?
If essentially all you need is key-value storage, Berkeley DB for
19 matches
Mail list logo
