Lucene Spatial Search Problem: search radius threshold?

Hello, I am trying to add spatial search functionality to my application, but having a trouble regarding lucene's spatial search. It's very simple functionality: searching all items within given radius from given starting point. My current starting location is 37.504602,127.049031. When I set

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

Wow cool , I will give that a try! Thank you!! Alex -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/New-codecs-keep-Freq-skip-omit-Pos-tp2849776p2852370.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: Lucene Spatial Search Problem: search radius threshold?

Below is TestCartesian class. In this class, I changed starting position and predefined positions in addData method to be around 37.504602,127.049031. The problem is that as I increase the search radius, after some threshold, spatial search returns nothing when it should return at least the same

Lucene Spatial Search Problem: search radius threshold?

Hello, I am trying to add spatial search functionality to my application, but having a trouble regarding lucene's spatial search. It's very simple functionality: searching all items within given radius from given starting point. My current starting location is 37.504602,127.049031. When I set se

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Alex vB wrote: > I also indexed one time with Lucene 3.0. Are those sizes really completely > the same? > > Standard 4.0 W Freq W Pos       28.1 GB > Standard 4.0 W/O Freq W/O Pos   6.2 GB > Standard 3.0 W Freq W Pos       28.1 GB > Standard 3.0 WO Freq WO Pos    

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Alex vB wrote: > During indexing I use StandardAnalyzer (StandardFilter, LowerCaseFilter, > StopFilter). > Can I get somewhere more information for Codec creation or is there just > "grubbing" through the code? try the following patch to switch PFOR1 and PFOR2 ov

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

I also indexed one time with Lucene 3.0. Are those sizes really completely the same? Standard 4.0 W Freq W Pos 28.1 GB Standard 4.0 W/O Freq W/O Pos 6.2 GB Standard 3.0 W Freq W Pos 28.1 GB Standard 3.0 WO Freq WO Pos 6.2 GB Regards Alex -- View this message in context: http:

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

Hello Robert, thank you for the answers! :) Currently I used PatchedFrameOfRef and PatchedFrameOfRef2. Therefore both implementations are PForDelta! Sorry my mistake. PatchedFrameOfRef2: PforDelta W/O Freq W/O Pos 1.6 GB PatchedFrameOfRef : Pfor W/O Freq W/O Pos