Hi Robert,
the adapted codec is running but it seems to be incredible slow. Will take
some time ;)
Here are some performance results:
Indexing scheme
Index Size
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Alex vB wrote:
>
> I am a little bit curious about the Lucene 3.0 performance results because
> the larger index seems to
> work faster?!? I already ran the test several times. Are my results
> realistic at all? I thought PForDelta/2 would outperform the standard i
> it depends upon the type of query.. what queries are you using for
> this benchmarking and how are you benchmarking?
> FYI: for benchmarking standard query types with wikipedia you might be
> interested in http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/luceneutil/
I have 1 queries from a AOL d
hi，all
I'm working on a Chinese contact search project, I need to transform
the Chinese words to its Pinyin form.
e.g.
中国--> zhongguo
The problem I encounter is that for some chinese words which have more than
one transforms, like. 贾-> jia, 贾->gu, ...
I already used the ICUTransformFilter
2011/4/23 Weiwei Wang :
> hi，all
> I'm working on a Chinese contact search project, I need to transform
> the Chinese words to its Pinyin form.
>
> e.g.
> 中国--> zhongguo
>
> The problem I encounter is that for some chinese words which have more than
> one transforms, like. 贾-> jia, 贾->gu, ...
On Apr 21, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Clemens Wyss wrote:
> I keep my search terms in a dedicated RAMDirectory (the termIndex).
> In there I palce all the term of my real index. When putting the terms into
> the
> termIndex I can still see [using the debugger] the Umlaute (äöü).
> Unfortunately when s
