Re: Modify Field.Index.NO to Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED

2011-11-10 Thread ppp c
terrible. you have made a big mistake, since you in fact made the primary key unsearchable. There is no any other method, since deleteDocument, updateDocument both need Term to be searchable. The only way is during the traversal of all the docs and finding the matched field and delete it. On Fri,

Modify Field.Index.NO to Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED

2011-11-10 Thread Thanh Ha
I indexed my document using Field.Index.NO as the field index type, so now I cannot search it to make updates. Here's how the document was added: Document doc = new Document(); doc.add(new Field("content_id", "1234", Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.NO, Field.TermVector.NO)); The content_id is the p

Re: Improving indexing speed

2011-11-10 Thread Ian Lea
And how long does it take just to read and parse the files, without indexing them? Often that is the problem - nothing to do with lucene. There is plenty of good advice in http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveIndexingSpeed. A good match on the subject of your message! -- Ian. On Thu, Nov

Re: Improving indexing speed

2011-11-10 Thread Simon Willnauer
can you provide more information about your setup? things like how much time does it take to index you documents, how many docs do you index, what are your index writer settings, how many cores do you have, where do you read from and write to (disks). oh and what version of lucene are you using? t

Improving indexing speed

2011-11-10 Thread antony jospeh
Hi all, I have a large number of files in a directory need to be index them. All the files are in specific format need to parse to extract information after that i had to index. Single thread process one file at a time then i decided to use multi threads when the main thread that loops the directo

Re: my question about lucene

2011-11-10 Thread Ian Lea
You can provide your own Similarity implementation, overriding whichever of the methods you need in order to achieve your aims. Use it via the setxxx methods mentioned in the javadocs and unless you deliberately sort by some other field everything should fall into place. -- Ian. 2011/11/9 强继朋

Spell check on a subset of an index ( 'namespace' aware spell checker)

2011-11-10 Thread E. van Chastelet
Hi all, In our project we like to have the ability to get search results scoped to one 'namespace' (as we call it). This can easily be achieved by using a filter or just an additional must-clause. For the spellchecker (and our autocompletion, which is a modified spellchecker), the story seems

How to get the term offsets for wild card queries?

2011-11-10 Thread Vidya Kanigiluppai Sivasubramanian
Hi, I am using 2.9.2 version of lucene. For my project I need to find the term positions in the document for it to be highlighted in the display. For normal queries it works fine. But with wild card queries, there is no offset info available. This is my code: QueryParser qp = new Que