Hi,
Thanks, this *may* cause the exception, but it is impossible that the
exception stack trace you are posting occurs in Lucene's code with a default
precision step on a numeric field, as you use here. I assume it's a 32bit
integer (NumericField.setIntValue or setFloatValue)?
Please provide us y
Yes, there is one.
This is how the field is being created:
new NumericField("timestamp", Field.Store.NO, true);
Thus, the field is not stored, but indexed.
thx,
thushara
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Do you have NumericFields? If yes, how are they configured?
>
> -
Do you have NumericFields? If yes, how are they configured?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Thushara Wijeratna [mailto:thu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:25 AM
> To:
I got this exception while indexing with Lucene 3.4:
Exception in thread "Thread-0" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Illegal
shift value, must be 0..31
at
org.apache.lucene.util.NumericUtils.intToPrefixCoded(NumericUtils.java:157)
at
org.apache.lucene.analysis.NumericTokenStream.incrementToke
On 16/12/2011 22:51, Rene Hackl-Sommer wrote:
Maybe you could just use MatchAllDocsQuery?
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_5_0/api/core/org/apache/lucene/search/MatchAllDocsQuery.html
Rene
Ah thanks Rene, thats what I wanted
Paul
Maybe you could just use MatchAllDocsQuery?
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_5_0/api/core/org/apache/lucene/search/MatchAllDocsQuery.html
Rene
Am 16.12.2011 22:58, schrieb Paul Taylor:
On 16/12/2011 20:54, Paul Taylor wrote:
Thanks I think you might have it, but tell me if forceMergeDelete
On 16/12/2011 20:54, Paul Taylor wrote:
On 16/12/2011 17:43, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
I'm adding documents to an index, at a later date I modify a
document and
update the index, close the writer and open a new IndexReader. My
indexreader iterates over terms for that field and docFreq() returns
On 16/12/2011 17:43, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
I'm adding documents to an index, at a later date I modify a document and
update the index, close the writer and open a new IndexReader. My
indexreader iterates over terms for that field and docFreq() returns one
as I
would expect, however the iter
Is there an entity-relationship of the segment files and/or Berkeley
DB tables (with table definitions)?
I'm trying understand the segment files of Lucene and know that a
Berkeley DB can be used to store the directory but can't locate any ER
diagram or table definitions for the DB.
Thanks
Ray
--
Have you looked at Lucene's "MoreLikeThis"? I confess I haven't
worked with this enough to recommend *how* to use it, but it seems
like it's in the general area you're talking about.
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_5_0/api/contrib-queries/org/apache/lucene/search/similar/MoreLikeThis.html
Best
Er
The .docFreq() call returns the number of documents that the current
term in the enum is in, not all terms in the term enum.
Also be aware of, from the lucene wiki : "Once a document is deleted it
will not appear in TermDocs nor TermPositions enumerations, nor any
search results. Attempts to load
Thanks for the response Donna. That would make more sense, but the items
I'm pulling in from the web contain large bodies of text (descriptions)
whereas the products in my catalog consist of shorter fields such as
product name, manufacturer, product code, etc. So using the smaller fields
from my ca
Hi,
> I'm adding documents to an index, at a later date I modify a document and
> update the index, close the writer and open a new IndexReader. My
> indexreader iterates over terms for that field and docFreq() returns one
as I
> would expect, however the iterator returns both the old value of the
On 16/12/2011 17:10, Ian Lea wrote:
Shouldn't
iw.updateDocument(new Term(FIELD1,"term1"),document);
be
iw.updateDocument(new Term(FIELD1,"test"),document);
if you want to replace the first doc?
Hmm, you are right if I change it I then get
TermDocsFreq1
test
TermDocsFreq1
test2
(but doesn
Shouldn't
iw.updateDocument(new Term(FIELD1,"term1"),document);
be
iw.updateDocument(new Term(FIELD1,"test"),document);
if you want to replace the first doc?
--
Ian.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> I'm adding documents to an index, at a later date I modify a document a
I'm adding documents to an index, at a later date I modify a document
and update the index, close the writer and open a new IndexReader. My
indexreader iterates over terms for that field and docFreq() returns one
as I would expect, however the iterator returns both the old value of
the documen
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're trying to do, but why not do it the
other
way around; that is, index the items in your catalog, and use the items on
the web
as the query into the catalog. I have an analogous process (though
completely
different application area) and I index the stuff th
Hello~
Have anyone needed a method, getAnalyzer(String fieldName) of
PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper class, so far?
A method getDefaultAnalyzer() as well.
It is useful in my project.
The needs would be unusual, though. Implementing these methods is very simple.
Does Apache Lucene have any plan to add
18 matches
Mail list logo
