Hello all,
I try the following :
deltaQuery=SELECT PerID AS quot;PerIDquot; FROM Person WHERE PerUpd gt;
to_date('${dataimporter.functions.formatDate(dataimporter.last_index_time,dd/MM/
HH:mm:ss)}','DD/MM/ HH24:MI:SS')
But when I pass into VariableResolverImpl.resolve of dataimport
Sorry, I'm coming up empty in Google here.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
DirectoryReader.openIfChanged
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 4:54 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
TopDocs top = searcher.search(contextQuery, filter, maxDocsToRetrieve);
Which document fields are included in the calculation of the scores in
the returned items? All fields? All fields touched in the query? Would
https://builds.apache.org//job/Lucene-trunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/artifacts/changes/Changes.html
-Original Message-
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 11:11 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: What replaces
To reduce noise slightly I'll stay on this thread.
I'm looking at this file, and not seeing a pointer to what to do about
QueryParser. Are jar file rearrangements supposed to be in that file?
I think that I don't have the right jar yet; all I'm seeing is the
'surround' package.
You want the lucene-queryparser jar. From trunk MIGRATE.txt:
* LUCENE-3283: Lucene's core o.a.l.queryParser QueryParsers have been
consolidated into module/queryparser,
where other QueryParsers from the codebase will also be placed. The
following classes were moved:
-
OK, thanks.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote:
You want the lucene-queryparser jar. From trunk MIGRATE.txt:
* LUCENE-3283: Lucene's core o.a.l.queryParser QueryParsers have been
consolidated into module/queryparser,
where other QueryParsers from the
Hi ,
I'm new to Lucene.Can anyone tell me how can i start learning about it with
the code base.
I have knowledge of endeca search engine and have worked on it.
So, if anyone could relate it and give any any start.
--
View this message in context:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no javadoc on here yet, and I am a little puzzled by the fact
that it is returning null for me. Does that imply that there can't be
any deleted docs known to the reader?
Right, see AtomicReader
/** Returns
Thank you to Simon Willnauer the Lucene PMC chair for taking some time to speak
with us.
You can download the podcast at:
http://www.rce-cast.com/Podcast/rce-67-lucene-indexing-and-search.html
If you have any questions or any projects you would like to see on the show
please let me know off
This book is your best buddy: http://www.manning.com/hatcher3/
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:01 PM, rahul reddy v.rahul1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I'm new to Lucene.Can anyone tell me how can i start learning about it with
the code base.
I have knowledge of endeca search engine and have worked
I botched the release the fixed release can now be found at:
http://www.rce-cast.com/Podcast/rce-67-lucene-indexing-and-search-v2.html
That copy is the full 40 minutes!
Brock Palen
www.umich.edu/~brockp
CAEN Advanced Computing
bro...@umich.edu
(734)936-1985
On Mar 5, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Brock
Hi Rahul,
The first thing you should do it get a copy of Lucene in Action, Second
Edition book and start reading from head to toe. This book is fabulous
book on lucene and give you complete insight into this framework.
Also if you want to use lucene to develop some kind of seach interface,
then
I would definitely not suggest using SSS for fields like legal brief text or
emails where there is huge
variability in the length of the content -- i can't think of any context
where a short email is
definitively better/worse then a long email. more traditional TF/IDF seems
like it would
-Original Message-
My only thought is that the new stuff seems to be at the expense of the
formulas listed in the old
class overview for Similarity.
http://lucene.apache.org/core/old_versioned_docs/versions/3_5_0/api/all/org/apache/lucene/searc
h/Similarity.html
Opps, my bad.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Paul Hill p...@metajure.com wrote:
I would definitely not suggest using SSS for fields like legal brief text or
emails where there is huge
variability in the length of the content -- i can't think of any context
where a short email is
definitively
17 matches
Mail list logo
