Re: Re-indexing a particular field only without re-indexing the entire enclosing document in the index

2012-04-23 Thread Brandon Mintern
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jong Kim wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > Our metadata is not stored in a single field, but is rather a collection of > fields. So, it requires a boolean search that spans multiple fields. My > understanding is that it is not possible to iterate over the matching

Re: Re-indexing a particular field only without re-indexing the entire enclosing document in the index

2012-04-23 Thread Jong Kim
Thanks for the reply. Our metadata is not stored in a single field, but is rather a collection of fields. So, it requires a boolean search that spans multiple fields. My understanding is that it is not possible to iterate over the matching documents efficiently using termDocs() when the search inv

PhoneticFilterFactory 's inject parameter

2012-04-23 Thread Elmer van Chastelet
Hi all, (scroll to bottom for question) I was setting up a simple web app to play around with phonetic filters. The idea is simple, I just create a document for each word in the English dictionary, each document containing a single search field holding the value after it is preprocessed using

Re: delete entries from posting list Lucene 4.0

2012-04-23 Thread Zeynep P.
Hi, Thanks for the fix. I also wonder if you know any collection (free ones) to test pruning approaches. Almost all the papers use TREC collections which I don't have!! For now, I use Reuters21578 collection and Carmel's Kendall's tau extension to measure similarity. But I need a collection with

Re: Re-indexing a particular field only without re-indexing the entire enclosing document in the index

2012-04-23 Thread Earl Hood
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Jong Kim wrote: > Is there any good way to solve this design problem? Obviously, an > alternative design would be to split the index into two, and maintain > static (and large) data in one index and the other dynamic part in the > other index. However, this approa

Re: stored field norm

2012-04-23 Thread Akos Tajti
Thanks, Ian, I checked the documentation and it turned out that the lengt normalization made the norm so small. I started using SweetSpotSimilarity for that field and now the scores are ok. Ákos On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Ian Lea wrote: > Look at norm(t,d) in the javadocs for Similarit

Re: stored field norm

2012-04-23 Thread Ian Lea
Look at norm(t,d) in the javadocs for Similarity. Note use of the word "encapsulates". Also note the stuff on loss of precision. -- Ian. On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Akos Tajti wrote: > Dear All, > > when indexing an object I create a document that contains a field called > title. I set

stored field norm

2012-04-23 Thread Akos Tajti
Dear All, when indexing an object I create a document that contains a field called title. I set the boost of that field to 60. After the indexing was complete I checked the document using luke. The norm field for it contained 40. Shouldn't this column (the field norm) contain the boost that was se