On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Ian Lea wrote:
> I think you can store field "x" using byte[] as one Field and index it
> using String as another Field. Or define your own FieldType and use
> the Field(String name, byte[] value, FieldType type) constructor. Or
> is that where you're getting an
It actually did. I'll cross check once more and make sure I was doing it
correctly.
Warm Regards,
Tariq
https://mtariq.jux.com/
cloudfront.blogspot.com
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Ian Lea wrote:
> "AA-" indexed as a StringField was matched by a TermQuery for "AA"?
> Sounds surprising.
>
>
"AA-" indexed as a StringField was matched by a TermQuery for "AA"?
Sounds surprising.
--
Ian.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Mohammad Tariq wrote:
> Thanks again Ian. I'll make the changes suggested by you. And I am using
> dots because if I search for 'AA' it was giving me 'AA-' as well.
>
Thanks again Ian. I'll make the changes suggested by you. And I am using
dots because if I search for 'AA' it was giving me 'AA-' as well.
Warm Regards,
Tariq
https://mtariq.jux.com/
cloudfront.blogspot.com
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Ian Lea wrote:
> From a glance it looks fine. I don't
>From a glance it looks fine. I don't see what you gain by adding dots
- you are using a TermQuery which will only do exact matches. Since
you're using StringField your text won't be tokenized but stored as
is. I see you're searching on a mixed case term - that's fine as long
as you don't expect
I think you can store field "x" using byte[] as one Field and index it
using String as another Field. Or define your own FieldType and use
the Field(String name, byte[] value, FieldType type) constructor. Or
is that where you're getting an Exception?
How big is your index, or how small are your
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Chris Bamford
wrote:
>> Could you please send this to the java-user@lucene.apache.org list?
>
> I thought I did! :-) Here it is again:
Duh, my bad :) You are right!
I saw the "Hi Mike" and stopped there!
Responses below:
> I have a question about your post
Hello Ian,
*
*
I started as directed by you and created the index. Here is a small
piece of code which I have written. Please have a look over it :
*
*
*public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException, ParseException {
*
* *
*//Specify the analyzer for tokenizing text. The same
Hi Mike,
> Could you please send this to the java-user@lucene.apache.org list?
I thought I did! :-) Here it is again:
I have a question about your post "Searching relational content with Lucene's
BlockJoinQuery"
(http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2012/01/searching-relational-content-with.html).
Hi Chris,
Could you please send this to the java-user@lucene.apache.org list?
I'll try to answer it there ... this way future Googlers can benefit.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Chris Bamford
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I have a question about your p
Ian and et al,
Just a doubt. Now that I have to index and store(disk space is a
constraint here). I have identified that storing as byte[] helps save some
disk. But it isn't possible to index a byte[], am getting an exception when
the field to be indexed is a byte[].
So how do I go
11 matches
Mail list logo
