>
> Would you like to submit a patch that changes SortingMergePolicy to
> use the approach that you are proposing using bitsets instead of
> sorting int[] arrays?
Sure can do that. Can you open a ticket for this, as I don't know what
versions this can go in?
--
Ravi
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:
Any one ?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Muhammad Ismail
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have simple index with 2 fields i.e. title and body. When i perform a
> simple search query like bring document which have particular text like
> lazy or dog or brown in either title or body but I want matches in title
Depending on your version of Lucene, perhaps:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_10_4/core/org/apache/lucene/document/Field.html#setBoost(float)
-Original Message-
From: Muhammad Ismail [mailto:it.is.ism...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 3:22 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sub
I am using Lucene version 3.0.0. I am already setting boost to field but
still result are not according to requirement i.e. Document that have all
the matching term either in title or body field must be on top. Regardless
of term frequency & idf.
1. I have 2 fields in document i.e. Title & bod
Hi West
thank you for the help. I will try your suggestion.
thank you again
Peyman
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:01 PM, west suhanic
wrote:
> Hi Robust Links:
>
> I think you want to build a class that implements the LeafCollector.
> For example:
>
> public class theLeafCollectorDocid implements
i am getting below exception while using apache lucene in web service with
tomcat ,axis 2 .This exception is not coming in standalone application.
Java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: A SPI class of type
org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec with name 'Lucene42' does not exist. You
need to add the corresp
Hi,
This generally happens if you don't deploy the original Lucene JAR files and
instead create so-called super-jars (one large JAR file with all classes merged
together). Unfortunately this approach misses to copy/merge relevant metadata
in the META-INF folder of the original JARs. Without the
Hi. I am studying Lucene performance and in particular how it benefits from
faster I/O such as SSD and NVMe.
I am using nightlybench for indexing wiki (1K docs) with similar parameters as
used in nightlyBench. (Hardware: Intel Xeon, 2.5GHz, 20 processor ,40 with
hyperthreading, 64G Memory) and s
: Hi. I am studying Lucene performance and in particular how it benefits from
faster I/O such as SSD and NVMe.
: parameters as used in nightlyBench. (Hardware: Intel Xeon, 2.5GHz, 20
: processor ,40 with hyperthreading, 64G Memory) and study indexing speed
...
: I get best performance
Hello,
I'm not sure if this is the correct approach, so please let me know if there is
a better way to accomplish the following task
I am attempting to search an entire database for a keyword. To do this, I
indexed all the data fields into a single "content" field with a delimiter
between each
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your comment. You are correct, it looks to be CPU bound. However I
am monitoring CPU utilization on all cores (40) and don't see close to 100%
utilization on 20 cores, but all cores show activity ranging from %20 to 80%
with lots of ups and downs.
Can you help me understand
(cross posted, please confine any replies to general@lucene)
A quick reminder and/or heads up for htose who haven't heard yet: this
year's Lucene/Solr Revolution is happeing in Austin Texas in October. The
CFP and Early bird registration are currently open. (CFP ends May 8,
Early Bird ends
Hi,
I have SOLR 4.9 with master/slave architecture. And I use DocValue for
custom ranking. After I update doc on master, it looks like the DocValue not
get replicated to slave. After I wait for next poll from slave, it¹s OK. Is
there a delay of replicate or loading of DocValues?
Thanks a lot!
13 matches
Mail list logo