Any thoughts?
On Monday, February 29, 2016, Gimantha Bandara wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are using lucene to index our data and are maintaining millions of
> documents in sharded indices. Currently what we do is, reading each shard
> separately and collecting the TopDocs using
Looking at the source code, it seeks as if only a limited syntax is
supported for field names (VARIABLE in the code) within Lucene Expressions
that corresponds to a subset of what Java/JavaScript/ECMAScript support
(ID: [_$a-zA-Z] [_$a-zA-Z0-9]*, plus a dotted list of IDs), and certainly
much less