I recently have had a problem with strange search results in lucene 5.5,
upgrading to 6.0 fixed that, so is upgrading to the latest version an
option for you?
Am 04.05.2016 23:08, schrieb Jeremy Glesner:
Thanks to Adrien for responding. I performed the explain on indexSearcher
in Lucene 5.4.1,
Thanks to Adrien for responding. I performed the explain on indexSearcher
in Lucene 5.4.1, the results are pasted below for Basti Bosan (the highest
ranked result) and Boston (the preferred result).
I'm not 100% sure how to interpret this based on (a) lucene's weighting of
the term in the document
great. thank you. sandbox was new to me. never would have searched there
quite funny name :-)
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 04. Mai 2016 um 11:31 Uhr
Von: "Torsten Krah"
An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: FieldCacheRangeFilter / DocValuesRangeFilter in lucene 5.5.0
DocValuesRangeFilter moved
DocValuesRangeFilter moved to the sandbox, see here:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/5_5_0/sandbox/org/apache/lucene/search/DocValuesRangeFilter.html
At least you could use it while migrating but as its deprecated and
experimental you still would need to migrate it again when its changed.
Cheers
hi,
i want to migrate our code from 4.6 to 5.5.
We used a FieldCacheRangeFilter but this no longer exists in Version 5. And
DocValuesRangeFilter does not exist anymore in 5.5.0
so what could i use?
greetings
Sascha
-
To
