Hi Volodymyr,
About the trick you described about wildcard search
replacement, you mentioned:
> So I found following workaround. I index this field
as > sequence of terms, each of containing single
digit from > needed value. (For example I have
123214213 value
> that needs to be indexed. Then i
Hi,
> Also this analyzer is not used in any application, I
> wrote it only to
> measure search speed.
So you don't use the method you described for your
wildcard search trick?
Thanks,
Aalap.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Hi,
I have similar issues in indexing time.
I am doing a SELECT from database and getting back
10,000 rows. I then start indexing each row and hence
would have 10,000 documents in my Lucene index. Each
doc has 27 fields.
I added some timing code to my indexing process. The
DB select call takes a
y job, so I
> will tune it later.
> This is just an example to give you an idea how it
> can work.
>
> regards,
> Volodymyr Bychkoviak
>
> Aalap Parikh wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> >>Also this analyzer is not used in any applicat
can fiddle
> with.
>
> I've seen Hibernate 2.* get sluggish once its
> Session gets filled up
> with a lot of objects.
>
> Otis
>
>
> --- Aalap Parikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have similar issues in indexing time.
ically.
> > There are other IndexWriter knobs you can fiddle
> with.
> >
> > I've seen Hibernate 2.* get sluggish once its
> Session gets filled up
> > with a lot of objects.
> >
> > Otis
> >
> >
> > --- Aalap Parikh <[EMAIL
Hi,
> : the app using JProfiler and found out that 90% of
> time
> : is spent in the IndexWriter.addDocument call. As
>
> what analyzer are you using?
I am using the StandardAnalyzer (tried using
SimpleAnalyzer too, but not much affect on
performance).
> : My machine: Pentium 4 CPU 2.40 GHz
> :
eed. (it can vary depending on indexing
> conditions)
>
> Regards,
> Volosymyr Bychkoviak.
>
> Aalap Parikh wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Thanks for your reply.
> >One more question. You mentioned that your
> technique
> >can be used for wildcard searc
y.
> > There are other IndexWriter knobs you can fiddle
> with.
> >
> > I've seen Hibernate 2.* get sluggish once its
> Session gets filled up
> > with a lot of objects.
> >
> > Otis
> >
> >
> > --- Aalap Parikh <[EMAIL PROTE
Thanks very much. Volodymyr, your trick about wildcard
search replacement has helped me a lot. Great idea!!!
Thanks a lot again.
--- Volodymyr Bychkoviak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Aalap Parikh wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >The idea about begin marker sou
Hi,
As per my understanding of Lucene, I think concurrent
search and update to an index should not corrupt the
index, given that only a single index-modifying
operation is executing at any point of time. So in
short, you can have multiple search operations and not
more than one index update (add a
Hi,
Use Luke. It's an excellent tool and everybody in the
Lucene community uses that.
http://www.getopt.org/luke/
Aalap.
--- avrootshell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I'm curious to know,if there is any way to view
> the .cfs file(the
> index file created).
>
> Someone plz shred s
Hi,
I just a general question: What are the pros and cons
of a split index(a number of small indexes) as opposed
to a single large index?
As I have repeatedly seen in various posts at this
group, people have opted for split indexes in cases
where they have a large number of documents (say > 1
mil
>I don't really know a lot about what gets loaded into
memory when you
>make/use a new searcher, but the one thing i've
learned from experience
>is
>that the FieldCache (which gets used when you sort on
a field) contains
>every term in the field you are sorting on, and an
instance of
>FieldCache
14 matches
Mail list logo
