Hello,
I have two separate indexes with similar fields. To search them at once I
created a IndexSearcher on top of a MultiReader initialized by two readers
of these two indexes. And it works well.
Since both indexes has a NumericDocValuesField called "id", I used this
field both for sorting and r
nized)? When you do a TermQuery(new Term("id", id_to_delete))
> beforehand, does it find the one document you want to delete?
>
> Can you boil the case down to a small testcase?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 201
Hello,
I am quite confused about the Lucene NRT feature. And there are not many
examples out there.
My understanding is we can create an DirectoryReader from a IndexWriter.
Whenever IndexWriter changes the index, we can use DirectoryReader to
detect the changes and recreate DirectoryReader if nec
Okay, it makes complete sense. Thanks.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Michael Sokolov <
msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
> On 10/3/13 6:04 PM, Alice Wong wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> That's an interesting idea. The only drawback is we have to re-parse the
> doc
A and
store a different value "1,2" associated with a1 in Lucene. Or there might
be a hack for this?
Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Michael Sokolov <
msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 07:12 PM, Alice Wong wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
Hello,
We would like to index some documents. Each field of a document may have
multiple values. And for each (field,value) pair there are some associated
values. These associated values are just for retrieving, not searching.
For example, a document D could have a field named A. This field has t
Hi folks!
I'm using Lucene to provide search on my application.
The final query is a BooleanQuery with many fields, there are fields where
I'll look for the entered keyword and some others to restrict the search, as
the id of a category.
I read, and seems to be true, that when using Ter
-Original Message-
From: Ruslan Sivak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quinta-feira, 11 de janeiro de 2007 15:12
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Huge Index
Alice,
If you have a computer that crashes once you put a lot of load on it,
I'd say you have bigger problems t
ginal Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: quinta-feira, 11 de janeiro de 2007 15:07
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Huge Index
Hi Alice,
Can you define slow (hours, days, months and on what hardware)? Have
you done any profiling, etc. to see wher
u use multiple threads/machines to index the data into separate
indexes, and then combine them?
Russ
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-Original Message-
From: "Alice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:47:36
To:
Subject: Huge Index
Hello!
I ha
e") gives me the info
I need to figure out why I am not getting hits. So, if you haven't
tried using it yet, I would suggest it.
On Dec 6, 2006, at 7:38 AM, Alice wrote:
> Going through the javadocs, thats wath I found out:
>
> About the positionIncrement of Token.cla
Going through the javadocs, thats wath I found out:
About the positionIncrement of Token.class:
" Set it (positionIncrement) to zero to put multiple terms in the same
position.
This is useful if, e.g., a word has multiple stems. Searches for phrases
including either stem will match. In this c
I'm sorry, I'm not sure about what you're asking me to post, anyway here is
my junit test:
protected void setUp() throws Exception
{
super.setUp();
access = ServiceLocator.getAccess();
}
public void testSearch() throws Exception
{
String keyword = "wi
tiple tokens associated with it. I believe this
should be a pretty common phenomenon with a synonym analyzer.
I would look into your Analyzer...my guess is that it has not been
perfected. You are indexing and searching with the same analyzer, correct?
- Mark Miller
Alice wrote:
> It does n
a-feira, 5 de dezembro de 2006 18:58
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Customized Analyzer
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 21:37, Alice wrote:
> It does not work.
>
> Even with the synonyms indexed it is not found.
So if your text contains "wind" it is not found by the q
org
Subject: Re: Customized Analyzer
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 20:14, Alice wrote:
> It returns
> content:"(wind window)"
That might be the correct representation of a MultiPhraseQuery. So does
your query work anyway? It's just that you cannot use QueryParser again to
pars
Sorry, I forgot to include this information:
Doing:
token.setPositionIncrement(0);
It returns
content:"(wind window)"
With:
token.setPositionIncrement(1);
Returns:
content:"wind window"
I really don't get it..
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: te
Hello!
I wrote a custom analyzer that has synonyms of some words to help on search.
I use the analyzer when searching the user's entered keyword.
What is happening that I don't understand why is that when tokens are
returned from the synonyms set, the query parser returns the query with
gh"?
There is one other possibility, soundex/metaphone. There's a discussion in
Lucene in Action about how to do this. The basic idea is that you index and
search on words that "sound like" what's in the document. Whether "sounds
like" makes Fred and Frederich equi
an create rules for wildcarding, you can create rules for
stemming By that I mean that if you have a programmatic way to turn
"Frederich" into "Fred", you can just index and search on "Fred" equally
easily and not have to deal with wildcard complexity.
Of course, since I don
Hello!
I am totally new to Lucene and I'm trying to use it with my web application.
What I'm doing is reading a table from my database line by line and indexing
the columns.
I read the users data such as First Name, Last Name, Email and so on.
I hava a field by column, such as: firstName=
21 matches
Mail list logo
