This may not be directly relevant to Lucene, but I wanted to learn:
How does a web search engine do something like this.
Do they also "score every matching document on every query" OR
do they pick a subset first based on some static/offlline ranking criteria
then do what Lucene does OR
do they sea
operator is set to AND
Is this a bug. Can some one point me to a bug if it is or help me
understand so I can explain this behavior.
-Antony Sequeira
Tets code output follows:
Testing with default operator set to OR
(fo AND ba OR "fo ba") -> +:fo +:ba
Hi
I am aware that with Lucene I can not do negative only queries such as
-foo:bar
But today I ran into an issue where I realized even queries such as
+foo:bar +(-goobly:doo)
also never return any results.
Basically I get the impression that I can not have a clause like
+(-x:y)
anywhere in my
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:42:32 -0800, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Antony Sequeira wrote:
> > A user does a search for say "condominium", and i show him the 50,000
> > properties that meet that description.
> >
> > I need two other pieces of
Hi
I have the above requirement, for which I could not find a good way to do.
I think the best way to explain my problem would be to give an example.
I have documents where each document represents a real estate property
for sale in US.
So, each document would have a city associated with it.
(We i
