Hi,
I am using PhraseQuery with explicitly set term positions and slop=0, in
order to skip stop words. The field in my index is indexed with TermVector
positions.
When I do a query with stop words skipped, for example "internet for
research" (translated into PhraseQuery: "internet ? research"), I
upon your needs.
>
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Avi Rosenschein >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using PhraseQuery with explicitly set term positions and slop=0, in
> > order to skip stop words. The field in my index is indexed with
> T
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> What would it be?
>
For scoring to take into account the non-analyzed token stream.
That is, if a field is analyzed (stemmed, lowercased, maybe even stop words
removed), that is fine for indexing. But tokens in the query matching the
orig
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Aaron Lav wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:18:27PM +0200, Avi Rosenschein wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Grant Ingersoll >wrote:
> >
> > > What would it be?
> > >
> >
> > For scoring to
>
> Similarity can only be set per index, but I want to adjust scoring
> behaviour at a field level, to faciliate this could we pass make field name
> available to all score methods.
> Currently it is only passed to some such as lengthNorm() but not others
> such as tf()
>
> +1
-- Avi
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Mark Bennett wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> You're welcome to use any of my slides (Dave's got them), with attribution
> of course.
>
> BUT
>
> Have you considered a section something like "why the hell do you think
> Relevancy tweaking is gonna save you!?!?"
> Basi
On 4/30/10, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Avi Rosenschein wrote:
>> Also, tuning the algorithms to the users can be very important. For
>> instance, we have found that in a basic search functionality, the default
>> query parser operator OR works
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On May 2, 2010, at 5:50 AM, Avi Rosenschein wrote:
>
> > On 4/30/10, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 30, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Avi Rosenschein wrote:
> >>> Also, tuning the algor
The LUCENE-2091.patch file from the jira entry is essentially what we are
using. It should work fine.
-- Avi
2011/3/2 Gérard Dupont
> Hi,
>
> On 2 March 2011 07:50, Lahiru Samarakoon wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Do you have any BM 25 scoring implementation which can be used with
>> Lucene?
>>
>
>
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 00:41, Ilya Zavorin wrote:
> I need to implement a "quick and dirty" or "poor man's" translation of a
> foreign language document by looking up each word in a dictionary and
> replacing it with the English translation. So what I need is to tokenize
> the original foreign te
10 matches
Mail list logo
