Hi,
How can I get the last indexed timestamp of a Lucene Index? I am using
Lucene 3.6.
--
With Regards,
Deepak Shakya
Ds are fixed.
> >
> > There must be many other places where an app supplied docId might make
> > lucene behave funny. Need some help in identifying those areas at least
> for
> > understanding this problem correctly, if not solving it all together.
> >
> > --
> > Ravi
> >
> > --**--**-
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.**apache.org<
> java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.**org<
> java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
--
With Regards,
Deepak Shakya
http://www.google.com/profiles/justdpk
gt; Ian.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Deepak Shakya wrote:
> > Oh is it. So whenever in future these segments gets merged, i will have
> my
> > document count going down right?
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Ian Lea wrote:
> >
&
u care?
> They'll go away eventually as segments get merged.
>
> If you really do care, see IndexWriter,forceMergeDeletes(). See also
> the javadoc for that: This is often a horribly costly operation;
> rarely is it warranted.
>
>
> --
> Ian.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 1
s the new one. Is that not the case?
--
With Regards,
Deepak Shakya
passed to the fields while I am searching.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Trejkaz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Deepak Shakya wrote:
> > Hey Jack,
> >
> > Can you let me know how should I do that? I am using the Lucene 3.6
> version
> > and I d
of the analyzer transforming its input. But the bottom line is
> that you must do 100% of the same steps that analysis performs. If in
> doubt, pass your literals through the standard analyzer itself.
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Deepak Shakya
> Sent:
terms for BooleanQuery -
> Term("cs-method", "GET") should be "Term("cs-method", "get")".
>
> StandardAnalyzer is doing the lower-casing.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Deepak Shakya
> Sent: Sunday,
oes? Also, how can I change the BooleanQuery to work for the
above case?
--
With Regards,
Deepak Shakya
