I think this should be a new thread since it's a different problem.
Based on your description, I don't see any compelling reasons for you to
use Lucene just for indexing purposes, since you are not indexing text
docs as you indicated. Claiming database of lacking performance is not
accurate and o
Have you looked at Nutch or Hadoop? They are subprojects of Lucene,
developed specifically to support large-scale, distributed indexing.
Nutch is probably more mature whereas Hadoop supports clustering out of
the box...
ND
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh parab [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nutch has a ontology plugin based on Jena.
http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/OntologyPlugin
I haven't used it. Just by looking at the source code, it seems it just
a Owl parser. So apparently it only works with sources defined in OWL
format, not others such as RDF. I think you need to extend the sou
oking at an ETL tool that can be extended
for this purpose (I've started writing a plugin for Pentaho, but got
pulled off and haven't finished it -- and that was for Solr, not
lucene/nutch).
-D
> -----Original Message-
> From: Duan, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue
Could anyone provide any insight on why someone would use nutch/lucene
or any other search engines to index relational databases? With use
cases if possible? Shouldn't the database's own indexing mechanism be
used since it is more efficient?
If there is such a need of indexing the database conten
