weight value would also be useful in other cases, for
example to allow different weights in SpanTermQuery.
Regards,
Paul Elschot
On Friday 17 April 2009 12:18:46 Radhalakshmi Sreedharan wrote:
> To make the question simple,
>
> What I need is the following :
> If my document field is (
nfact
reduces my percentage.
I even overrode the queryNorm method to return a one, still the percentage did
not increase.
Any suggestions ?
-Original Message-
From: Radhalakshmi Sreedharan [mailto:radhalakshm...@infosys.com]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:37 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apach
Hi Steven,
Thanks for your reply.
I tried out your approach and the problem got solved to an extent but still it
remains.
The problem is the score reduces quite a bit even now as bc is not found in the
combinations
( bc,cd) ( bc,ef) and ( ab,bc,cd,ef) etc.
The boosting infact has a negative
Hi ,
I have a question related to SpanNearQuery.
As of now, the SpanNearQuery has the constraint that all the terms need to
present in the document.
Eg : If my SpanNearQuery terms are ( ab,bc,cd) all of them need to be found
within a span of "n" and unordered.
But my requirement is similar t
