I would very much like to see the .NET port in line with lucene java
This would result in index compatibility and equivalent features as that
lucene provides
George - Cheers for the continuous effort to keep lucene.net in line with
Lucene
Regards,
Prabhu
On 10/14/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL
If i understand correctly, is it that you dont want to make use of query
parse?
You need to parse a query string without using query parser and construct
the query and still want an analyzer applied on the outcome search.
On 5/22/0 p6, Irving, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Otis,
Thanks
exReader and IndexWriter can produce a write-lock.
>
> 15 apr 2006 kl. 18.56 skrev Raghavendra Prabhu:
>
> > You are creating two IndexWriters on the same directory
> >
> > I guess that is the reason for the problem and one holds the lock
> >
> > Rgds
>
You are creating two IndexWriters on the same directory
I guess that is the reason for the problem and one holds the lock
Rgds
Prabhu
On 4/15/06, Puneet Lakhina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I am very new to lucene. I am using it in my application to index and
> serach
> through text
While Indexing, I use a different Analyser
While searching, I use a simple standard Analyzer
Will this prevent me from getting the same best fragments when i do a search
for two terms say term1 and term2
Rgds
Prabhu
Database implementation of the index is always bound to be slow compared to
storing it on the filesystem.
Probably the group which stores indexes into Berkley DB should be able to
give you a performance measuer of what will happen you store indexex in
databases.
Rgds
Prabhu
On 4/8/06, Marios Sk
Does changing the merge factor
and setting the options to SetUseCompoundfile(false)
split a single index into multiple pieces.
Even i have been doing something similar and would like to know how it is
done
Rdgs
Prabhu
On 3/31/06, depsi programmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Thank
I would like to see lucene operate with hadoop
As you rightly pointed out, writing using FSDirectory to DFS would be a
performance issue.
I am interested in the idea. But i do not know how much time i can
contribute to this because of the little time which i can spare.
If anyone else is interest
Check Whether it has got anything to do with UTF
There is a new line difference between windows and linux
Rgds
Prabhu
On 3/24/06, Chris Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No that doesnt seem to be the problem.
>
> Anyone have any other ideas?
>
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I had
Hi
It can be used if you run cygwin (the latest version)
Please have a look at nutch wiki
And you are mailing the wrong list
Rgds
Prabhu
On 3/23/06, Babu, KameshNarayana (GE, Research, consultant) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hai All,
> Can NUTCH be used in Windoes OS
>
> -Original Mess
Hi
Does the inlink value problem solve the OPIC problem which was there.
That is on a recrawl, the page would have a higher score.
Does this fix that problem?
Rgds
Prabhu
Hi Mark
Currently both of the terms have the same score (weightage)
As you mentioned, i would want it to be decreased so during the next run
for selecting second fragment, term1 has less weightage and term2 which has
not been selected has more weightage
Thanks
Rgds
Prabhu
On 3/22/06, mark har
Hi guys
If anyone can tell me how to get the best fragments using the highligher
The query has two terms - term1 and term2
The search result display only term1 in the highlighter whereas term2 is
also there. How can i adjust the lucene highlighter to make sure that
atleast each term is displaye
Hi
I am using the highlightertest.java to extract the wild card terms.
I use the queryParser to parse my queryString
Then i store the text in a RAM directory ( which i want to scan)
and then rewrite it as mentioned in the highlighter example
query=query.rewrite(reader)
Now if i print the quer
Hi
When you rewrite a query using
query=query.rewrite(reader)
Does the query change automtically.
For example if the query was n*w and the reader has new,now,noow
Does the query change to new,now,noow
Can someone tell me how it works
Rgds
Prabhu
Hi
The problem which i am facing is that the query is Case Sensitive
If i type in BIG letters i am not able to see answers and if i type in
small letters i am able to see results
Is there anything by which i can do a case conversion
Now i am using a WhiteSpaceAnalyser . What Analyser should ch
Hi
I need different boosts for fields which we define in multifield query
parser
How can this be accomplished??
Rgds
Prabhu
does exactly
> what you want.
>
> GR,
> Rainer
>
>
> Raghavendra Prabhu wrote:
> > I want to use query parser to parse my query string
> >
> > But the default field should be a group of fields with different fields
> > where it is searched on
> >
I want to use query parser to parse my query string
But the default field should be a group of fields with different fields
where it is searched on
Can any one let me know
For example if my query is
new books
new should be searched in different fields ( content and title)
books should be sear
e ask on the Nutch mailing list (I answered your question in general@
> already).
> Also, please don't steal other people's threads - it's considered inpolite
> for obvious reasons.
>
> Otis
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Raghavendra Prabhu
Can nutch be made to use lucene query parser?
Rgds
Prabhu
On 2/23/06, Peter Keegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Otis,
>
> The Lucene server is actually CPU and network bound, as the index gets
> memory mapped pretty quickly. There is little disk activity observed.
>
> I was also able to run
21 matches
Mail list logo