simple as adding a searcher
manager refresh listener to each replica that acquires and records
every time we load new infos - and it might all just work! Maybe.
We'll see... If there's still troubles, we can then add
retry-to-different-instance as well.
Thanks for the help :)
>
&
Hi lucene-users,
We use the lucene-replicator to have a single indexing node push commits and
NRT updates
to a set of replicas.
Currently, each replica has the full dataset - there is no sharding.
We use a SearcherLifetimeManager to try to provide consistent pagination over
results.
So when w
Hi,
> On Jun 23, 2023, at 2:34 PM, Yixun Xu wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a service that creates and manages Lucene indices. The service is
> using Lucene 8 and I want to upgrade to Lucene 9, and I would like to be
> able to rollback the upgrade in case I encounter any issues (*). The
> problem
> Am 03.01.2023 um 13:49 schrieb _ SATNAM:
> > Hi,
> > The issue is my garbage collection is running quite often i configure my
> > JVM as recommended (Gone though several articles ,blogs on lucene) also
> > provide enough RAM and memory (not as large to trigger GC ) .Main cause of
> > concern is
vering this and proposing a fix!
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 7:36 PM Steven Schlansker
> wrote:
> Hi Lucene fans,
>
> We use lucene-replicator to copy our indexes from a primary to replica nodes.
> Usua
welcome change? Is there a better way to avoid hanging
here, other than to be bug-free?
It's quite challenging to figure out where the CopyState wasn't released, as
only a count is kept.
Thanks!
Steven Schlansker
---
Hi Lucene users,
I am developing a search application that needs to do some basic
summary statistics. We use Lucene 8.9.0.
To improve performance for e.g. summing a value across 10,000
documents, we are using DocValues as columnar storage.
In order to retrieve the DocValues without collecting all
On Nov 10, 2014, at 3:03 PM, Rob Nikander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an index that's about 700 MB, and it grows over days to until it
> causes problems with disk size, at about 5GB. If the JVM process ends, the
> index shrinks back to about 700MB, I'm calling IndexWriter.commit() all the
> time.
On May 7, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Cheng wrote:
>
> I have an index of multiple gigabytes which serves 5-10 threads and needs
> refreshing very often. I wonder if RAMDirectory is the good candidate for
> this purpose. If not, what kind of directory is better?
We found that loading and unloading RAMDir
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:14:59 +0100
Yann-Erwan Perio wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Steven Schlansker
> wrote:
>
> Certainly, but my problem still persists if I do not do it. I spent
> the whole night debugging the code, to no avail. As a matter of fact,
> when
On Jan 21, 2014, at 7:32 AM, Yann-Erwan Perio wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been working a bit with BytesRef recently, and I wonder whether
> the content of the equals() method, and more specifically the content
> of the bytesEquals(BytesRef other) method, is the intended one.
>
> I was made awar
ch release of
Lucene will require a full reindex when using this, which is a serious bummer.
So I think I'll hold out for 4.5 and hope that that solves my problem.
Thanks for the help!
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I hav
Hi,
I have a search application using Lucene 4.4.0 with various BinaryDocValues and
SortedSetDocValues.
We use MMapDirectory to help keep the Java heap small / GC pause times short
and instead rely on the OS buffer cache to keep things fast, which I gather is
generally considered a "best practi
On Jul 1, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> My current open source project is a Directory that is just like RAMDirectory,
> but everything is memory-mapped. The idea is it creates a disk file, opens
> it, and immediately deletes the file. The file still exists until the
> IndexReader/W
On Jun 28, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Emmanuel Espina wrote:
> I'm building a distributed index (mostly as a reasearch project for
> school) and I'm evaluating indexing the entire collection in memory
> (like google, facebook and others have done years ago). The obvious
> reason for this is performance c
On Jun 12, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Michael Sokolov
wrote:
> On 6/12/2013 7:02 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Michael Sokolov
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You may not have noticed that CharFilter extends Reader. The expected
>>> pattern he
Thanks for the pointer.
Steven
> On 6/11/2013 7:52 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I am trying to add a CharFilter to my Analyzer. I started with a
>> StandardAnalyzer wrapped with an ASCIIFoldingFilter. Then I realized that
>> it does not hand
Hi everyone,
I am trying to add a CharFilter to my Analyzer. I started with a
StandardAnalyzer wrapped with an ASCIIFoldingFilter. Then I realized that it
does not handle searches for names that include punctuation well, for example I
want a PrefixQuery "pf" to match "P.F. Chang's" or "zaras"
se/LUCENE-4845 ...
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Steven Schlansker
> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I am building an autocomplete index. The index contains both the names and
>> a small
.TopTermsScoringBooleanQueryRewrite(1));
Query mainQuery = new BooleanQuery();
mainQuery.add(allowedTypes, Occur.MUST);
mainQuery.add(prefixQuery, Occur.MUST);
Am I missing something obvious?
Thanks,
Steven Schlansker
On Mar 15, 2013, at 11:25 AM, "Uwe Schindler" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The API did not really change.
The API definitely did change, as before you would override the now-final
tokenStream method. But you are correct that this was not the root of the
problem.
> The bug is in your test:
> If you wou
Hi everyone,
I am trying to port forward to 4.2 some Lucene 3.2-era code that uses the
ASCIIFoldingFilter.
The token stream handling has changed significantly since them, and I cannot
figure out what I am doing wrong.
It seems that I should extend AnalyzerWrapper so that I can intercept the
To
22 matches
Mail list logo
