Re: SV: SV: Integrating dynamic data into Lucene search/ranking

2008-01-17 Thread Tobias Lohr
ultisearcher on top. The indexsearcher that uses the small RAMDir can be > rebinded > quite often. > > / > Regards > M > > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skickat: den 17 januari 2008 10:55 > Till: java-us

Re: SV: Integrating dynamic data into Lucene search/ranking

2008-01-17 Thread Tobias Lohr
r in the background > after this searcher has been created we are fireing some warm up queries > against it and after that we change the old searcher to point to the new one. > Works fine for us and we got large indexes (several millions of articles)... > > /Regards > Marcus >

Re: Integrating dynamic data into Lucene search/ranking

2008-01-16 Thread Tobias Lohr
/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Tobias Lohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:33:56 AM Subject: Integrating dynamic data into Lucene search/ranking I have a more architectural question, which is maybe sort of o

Integrating dynamic data into Lucene search/ranking

2008-01-15 Thread Tobias Lohr
I have a more architectural question, which is maybe sort of off topic, but as I want to implement it using Java and Lucene, it's the right forum however: I'm thinking of an approach to design a system that integrates dynamic information into a search (and a ranking) functionality using Lucene.

Sorting by multiple fields (conditions influencing each other?!)

2008-01-12 Thread Tobias Lohr
I'm sorting the search result using multiple fields. Some of them are "real" fields, within the index, but one is a "pseudo" field, a custom sort field, implemented by using a custom SortComparatorSource. I end up with the sorting conditions in exact this order: 1. Sort by score generate by cu