frequency calls on PostingsEnum are that
slow ?
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Vimal Jain*
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 1:43 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> As far as your performance problem is concerned, I don't know. Can you
> compare the number of documents that need to be evaluated in both cases,
> e
Thanks Adrien , I had a look at your blog post. Looks like this
Scorer#getMaxScore was added in lucene 8.0 , i am using 7.7.3.
A side question , is there any resource to help migrate newer major version
, i see lot of api changed from v7 to v8.
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Vimal Jain*
On Wed, Jun 21
; dynamic pruning, so I wonder if this is the reason why you are seeing
> slower queries. But since you mentioned custom term queries, maybe you
> never actually took advantage of dynamic pruning?
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:30 AM Vimal Jain wrote:
>
> > Ok , sorry , I realiz
perf drop is observed in reference to earlier implementation ( with
multiple term queries ).
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Vimal Jain*
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 1:01 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> You say you observed a performance drop, what are you comparing against?
>
> Le mar. 20 juin 2023, 08:
Note - i am using lucene 7.7.3
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Vimal Jain*
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:26 PM Vimal Jain wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to understand if fetching the term frequency of a term during
> scoring is relatively cpu bound operation ?
> Context - I am storing custom term freq
drop in my application and I suspect it's
because of this change.
Any insight or related articles for reference would be appreciated.
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Vimal Jain*
Hi Mike,
Any plans to author 3rd edition of Lucene in Action ?
Since 2nd edition ( based on lucene 4), things have changed quite a bit (
9.6.0)
So should we expect 3rd edition soon or any other references to learn new
things in latest lucene ?
.doc_1_Lucene50_0.tim_1_Lucene50_0.tip_1_Lucene70_0.dvd_1_Lucene70_0.dvm*
Is this some misconfiguration ? How do I fix it ?
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Vimal Jain*
