Re: Using Lucene to search live, being-edited documents

I would think this is more like it. But the essential thing, so it seems to me, is whether there is a requirement for a serialised index, i.e. a more permanent record, aside from the saved document. Then, if there is a penalty to creating the index compared to regex, stringsearch or so, it is justi

Semantic Search research?

Does anyone on the list know about the nature of this research or collaboration:- A search engine based on '25 years of cutting edge research from the Indian Institutes of Technology, the University of Delhi, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, and the University of Calif

Re: lsi as indexing algorithm with lucene

Hello all, following the link to SemanticVectors - related research there is this link:- Magnus Sahlgren. An introduction to random indexing. I would like to point out that Magnus Sahlgren has completed a PHd in this area which is both very readable

Re: crawler questions..

That's interesting. I've been working in python recently, not crawling though. But, as ever, the more you get into it the more curious you get. Did you come up with a solution to a node error? Are you really talking about a broken link, or are you just saying the bottom of the tree has been reached

Re: eXist, Lucene and XQuery

OK, right, that figures. Adam 2008/9/22 Gustavo Corral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Thanks a lot Adam, > > actually I'm returning now a plain ValueSequence instead a NodeSet and all > is working great now. It seems like NodeSet needs a predefined order to all > the algorithms work in the correct way. >

Re: eXist, Lucene and XQuery

Ah, hi Gustavo, I actually don't know this, but it seems that the implementation of XQuery in eXist places your results in an unsorted list! Or possibly it is placed in a hashmap with its own bindings representing, for instance, data types and so on? Thinking about this, I believe it is possible to

Re: Fwd: Hibernate Lucene trademark issues

Thanks for link and your write up. On 19/11/06, Shay Banon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since I do not want to invade Lucene user list regarding a discussion about Compass and Hiberante Search, but I still think that it is something that needs to get answered, here is a link to my blog post disc

Re: Lucene indexing RDF

ECTED]> wrote: adasal wrote: > As far as i have researched this I know that the gnowsis project uses both > rdf and lucene, but I have not had time to determine their relationship. > www.gnowsis.org/ I can tell you a bit about Gnowsis, as we (Aduna) are cooperating with the Gnows

Re: Lucene indexing RDF

What are the issues in indexing rdf? I would be interested to see a discusion of this. Off the top of my head it would be one thing to index the data, regardless of enclosing tags, but something else to employ the tags as adjunct to the index. Has this been approached anywhere? A third part would

Re: Ontologies in Lucene???

gobe, do you subscribe to the SemWeb and ONTAC mailing lists? Reading these lists, and from other sources, it is apparent that there is a lot of interest in building out ontologies and ontological usages from the small and immiediate. There is much discussion of folksonomies and their impact. What

Re: Lucene job

Ottis, I'm interested in the "remote" option. With thanks, AdamOn 17/03/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello,Somebody asked me if I knew any good Lucene people who'd be interested in some work that involves a good amount of Lucene...Here is some info.The company is in New York City

Re: Use the lucene for searching in the Semantic Web.

Presumably because this is the way of formulating an inductive statement. Just entering key words doesn't introduce the notion of a relationship between some known and some other unknown terms. > Queries match graph patterns against the target graph of the query. From http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/W

Re: Lucene + LSI

Thanks for these helpful links. Adam On 14/12/05, Dave Kor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/13/05, Dave Kor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/13/05, Ian Soboroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > We're also thinking about implementing

Re: Lucene + LSI

ading this or a mate of his is -:)) Any thoughts on random indexing methods (also no commercial implementation I think). But there must be a similarity to pLSI? Adam On 13/12/05, Sebastian Marius Kirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:53:42AM +, adasal wrote

Re: Lucene + LSI

There seem to be quite a few alternatives around. I would be interested in comments on the following:- The work at NITLE using Contextual Network Search (CNS) a graph-based alternative to LSI. This work *[PDF]* An Introduction to *Random* Indexing

Re: Regarding Lucene and LSI

Very interesting. Actually, reading Meet Lucene Part 2 by Otis Gospondnetic and Eric Hatcher there is mention of Egothor and MG4J. Egothor. What is not mentioned is Carrot" which, I think, originally has been used with Egothor but has also been submitted to Lucene CVS. There is a helpful discussion

Re: Regarding Lucene and LSI

gossamerthreads<http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/28530?page=last>shows an exchange about this. It seems not yet. BTW, meant to post to the list so forward my last email. Adam On 10/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/5/05,

Re: Regarding Lucene and LSI

There are LSI and LSI like implementations in open source, but I am unsure what the state of play is in Java. The most interesting work I know of is in Perl available (cvs permitting) from NITLE. What I would like to see is an implementation of Magnus