Nobody here, who is using spring-modules?
On 11/1/06, lude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
while starting a new project we are thinking about using the
spring-modules for working with lucene. See:
https://springmodules.dev.java.net/
Does anybody has experience with this higher level
support?
Thanks
lude
take these stored values for
sorting
Wouldn't it?
Greetings
lude
On 9/23/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: for years there is the discussion to make lucene able to sort on
TOKENIZED
: fields.
really? .. i've only been on the list since 1.4.3 but i don
future?
Thanks
lude
x?
Thanks lude
On 9/4/06, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 22:32 +0200, lude wrote:
> How do you have to define the query-string to get all documents of an
index
> be returned by using the QueryParser?
> In theory a query like 'NOT word_not_in_ind
#x27;t work (no documents are found).
Greetings
lude
Hi Andrzej,
a month ago you mentioned a new Lucene 2.0 compatible Version of luke.
Does it exist somewhere?
Thanks
lude
On 7/20/06, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lude wrote:
>> As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9
>
> Where did you get this informatio
Ok, you've got me! ;)
How do you assure that your IndexModifier (or IndexWriter/IndexReader)
is closed, when your application ends.
Or do you always use a IndexReader.unlock(Directory dir) at startup-time of
your application.
Thanks!
lude
On 8/21/06, Simon Willnauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED
7;s a litte performance. But it ensures that
1.) The change is visible immediately
2.) The write.lock (and commit.lock) doesn't remain when the application
shut down or crashes
On 8/20/06, Simon Willnauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/20/06, lude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
:
- I create an IndexModifier
- The applicaton crashes
- There exists a write-lock on the index
--> Next time I start the application the IndexModifier couldn't be opened
because of the locks.
What is the right way to check and delete old write locks?
Thanks
lude
'subject'
'Abstract of the message-text'
2. mail-2 'subject'
Attachment with name 'filename.doc' contains 'Abstract of
file-content'
Another Use-Case would be an extended search, which allows to select if
"attached files"
should be searched (yes or no).
Greetings
lude
Hi Dejan,
how do you query for email- and(!) attachment-documents,
if you just want to present one hit per email (even if the searchterm
matches
in the email- and(!) in the corresponding attachment-document)?
Thanks
lude
On 8/15/06, Dejan Nenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The approac
index mulitpart bodys (== more then one
file-attachment)?
One lucene-document for each part (==file)?
How do you handle the queries?
Greetings
lude
On 8/15/06, John Haxby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lude wrote:
> does anybody has an idea what is the best design approch for realizing
&
attachments:
1 x email_id, subject, sender_address, to_address, message_text
0..n x email_id, attachment_name, attachment_content
Disadvantage:
At query time it is difficult to aggregate the documents that belongs to
each other. One hit per email (including attachments) should be shown.
Any thoughts?
Thanks
lude
As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9
Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on Lucene
Version 1.4.3.
On 7/19/06, Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Mercredi 19 Juillet 2006 12:32, lude a écrit:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> thanks for answering
eleased on Feb 2005?
lude
On 7/18/06, Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Mardi 18 Juillet 2006 20:53, lude a écrit:
> Hello,
>
> sorry, didn't find the information elsewhere:
>
> 1.) Did the format of the lucene-index change between version 1.4.3 and
>
Hello,
sorry, didn't find the information elsewhere:
1.) Did the format of the lucene-index change between version 1.4.3 and 2.0?
2.) Is it possible to use the old Luke-Tool with a new lucene 2 index?
Thanks
lude
17 matches
Mail list logo
