Re: [Suggestions Required] 110 Concurrency users indexing on Lucene dont finish in 200 ms.

2014-02-23 Thread sree
estions-Required-110-Concurrency-users-indexing-on-Lucene-dont-finish-in-200-ms-tp4116625p4119186.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apach

Re: [Suggestions Required] 110 Concurrency users indexing on Lucene dont finish in 200 ms.

2014-02-21 Thread lukai
; View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Suggestions-Required-110-Concurrency-users-indexing-on-Lucene-dont-finish-in-200-ms-tp4116625p4118730.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >

RE: [Suggestions Required] 110 Concurrency users indexing on Lucene dont finish in 200 ms.

2014-02-20 Thread sree
A correction on the system details posted earlier... Windows runs on : 1CPU, 1 cores. 8 GB RAM Linux runs on : 1 CPU , 2 cores, 8 GB RAM -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Suggestions-Required-110-Concurrency-users-indexing-on-Lucene-dont-finish-in-200-ms

RE: [Suggestions Required] 110 Concurrency users indexing on Lucene dont finish in 200 ms.

2014-02-20 Thread Umashanker, Srividhya
, 4 cores. 8 GB RAM Linux runs on : 1 CPU , 2 cores, 8 GB RAM -Vidhya -Original Message- From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 6:03 PM To: Lucene Users Subject: Re: [Suggestions Required] 110 Concurrency users indexing on

Re: [Suggestions Required] 110 Concurrency users indexing on Lucene dont finish in 200 ms.

2014-02-20 Thread Michael McCandless
; Lucene_win_linux_Diff.xlsx > <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4118525/Lucene_win_linux_Diff.xlsx> > > Please share your thought... > > thanks > Sreedeep > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sugge

Re: [Suggestions Required] 110 Concurrency users indexing on Lucene dont finish in 200 ms.

2014-02-20 Thread sree
) Lucene_win_linux_Diff.xlsx <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4118525/Lucene_win_linux_Diff.xlsx> Please share your thought... thanks Sreedeep -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Suggestions-Required-110-Concurrency-users-indexing-on-Lucene-dont-finish-in-

Re: [Suggestions Required] 110 Concurrency users indexing on Lucene dont finish in 200 ms.

2014-02-13 Thread Michael McCandless
View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Suggestions-Required-110-Concurrency-users-indexing-on-Lucene-dont-finish-in-200-ms-tp4116625p4117133.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -

Re: [Suggestions Required] 110 Concurrency users indexing on Lucene dont finish in 200 ms.

2014-02-13 Thread sree
3.nabble.com/Suggestions-Required-110-Concurrency-users-indexing-on-Lucene-dont-finish-in-200-ms-tp4116625p4117133.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-u

Re: [Suggestions Required] 110 Concurrency users indexing on Lucene dont finish in 200 ms.

2014-02-11 Thread Michael McCandless
Lucene's indexing is very concurrent, especially in 4.x where we've added concurrent flushing: http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/05/265-indexing-speedup-with-lucenes.html Are you sure the bottleneck is in Lucene and not e.g. the server-side handling of suddenly receiving 110 X 10,50,100 document

[Suggestions Required] 110 Concurrency users indexing on Lucene dont finish in 200 ms.

2014-02-10 Thread Umashanker, Srividhya
Group - We have an Indexing and Searching Service (using Lucene 4.0) implemented over REST as part of our framework, which all the related modules will use to publish data that make it available for the UI. Moreover, every rest call that our service receives has a proxy timeout limit of 20