Hi Ivan,
No, we do not use StandardAnalyser or StandardTokenizer.
Most data is processed by
fTextTokenStream = result = new
org.apache.lucene.analysis.WhitespaceTokenizer(reader);
result = new ISOLatin2AccentFilter(result); // ISOLatin1AccentFilter
modified that ö -> oe
Jake,
With the bigram-based index we gave up for the struggle to find a well working
language based index.
We had implemented soundex (or different "sound"-alikes) and hyphenating but
failed to deliver a user explainable search result ("why is this ranked higher"
and so on...). One reason may b
Ivan can you describe more about your application?
The overall time for indexing has gotten much faster in 2.3, but this
is assuming things like retrieving a document from its original
source, filtering it, etc, are minimal. If you have an application
where most of the time is spent outsi
Yes Michael it seems our app takes time to retrieve docs from their
sources. I have to run some profiler tool to see where is the bottleneck
in our case.
Thanks to you and Uwe for the answers!
Ivan
Michael McCandless wrote:
Ivan can you describe more about your application?
The overall time
Hi Uwe,
I am curious what NGramStemFilter is? Is it a combination of porter
stemming and word ngram identification?
Thanks!
Jay
Uwe Goetzke wrote:
Hi Ivan,
No, we do not use StandardAnalyser or StandardTokenizer.
Most data is processed by
fTextTokenStream = result = new org.apache.lucene
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:32:24 PM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Uwe,
I am curious
- Original Message
From: Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:32:24 PM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Uwe,
I am curious what NGramStemFilter is? Is it a combination of porter
stemming an
a-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 6:15:54 PM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Sorry, I could not find the filter in the 2.3 API class list (core +
contrib + test). I am not ware of lucene config file either. Could you
please tell me where it
/index.html
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 6:15:54 PM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Sorry, I could
gt;
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 12:04:33 AM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Otis,
I checked that contrib before and could not find NgramStemFilter. Am I
missing other contrib?
Thanks for the link!
Jay
Otis Gospodne
-- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:32:24 PM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Uwe,
I am curious what NGramStem
dependent searching.
Regards Uwe
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: yu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 05:26
An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Sorry for my ignorance, I am looking for
Ng
ache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 12:04:33 AM
Subject: Re: AW: feedback: Indexing speed improvement lucene 2.2->2.3.1
Hi Otis,
I checked that contrib before and could not find NgramStemFilter. Am I
missing other contrib?
Thanks for the link!
Jay
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hi Jay,
Sorry
13 matches
Mail list logo
