Hi,
I have an index which contains two very distinct types of fields:
- Some fields are large (many term documents) and change fairly slowly.
- Some fields are small (mostly titles, names, anchor text) and change fairly
rapidly.
Right now I keep around the large fields in raw form and when the
OK, this isn't well thought out, more the first thing that
pops to mind...
You're right, Lucene doesn't do joins. But would it serve
to keep two indexes? One the slow-changing stuff
and one the fast-changing stuff. They are related by
some *external* (as in "not the Lucene doc id)
field.
You'd h
- Original Message -
From: "Erick Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 5:43 AM
Subject: Re: Almost parallel indexes
OK, this isn't well thought out, more the first thing that
pops to mind...
You're right, Lucene doesn't
: I can't really use ParallelReader to keep the indexes the same; it
: requires me to add documents to both indexes which means I have to
: retokenize the large fields anyway. I would want to do a "join" on an
: external id, and as far as I can tell, Lucene doesn't support that.
correction: it
