ok, thanks a lot for the clarification.
> On 27. Feb 2021, at 13:23, Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> It's indeed working. As Robert suggested, it's in the sandbox more because
> it's unclear if it is really needed than because it is unstable.
>
> The few data points I have suggest that among the users
egers than
true 128 bits integers.
Le sam. 27 févr. 2021 à 11:20, Michael Kleen a écrit :
> Looking at TestBigIntegerPoint it seems to me that the core functionality
> of BigIntegerPoint
> is working. Is there any reason you would advise me for not using it ? Is
> there anything
> m
Looking at TestBigIntegerPoint it seems to me that the core functionality of
BigIntegerPoint
is working. Is there any reason you would advise me for not using it ? Is there
anything
missing ?
> On 26. Feb 2021, at 22:14, Robert Muir wrote:
>
> It was added to the sandbox original
so on. So it got love.
Not many people need 128-bit range queries I suppose?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 1:25 PM Michael Kleen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am interested in using BigIntegerPoint. What is the reason that it is
> part of the sandbox ? Is it ready for use ?
>
> Many t
Hello,
I am interested in using BigIntegerPoint. What is the reason that it is part of
the sandbox ? Is it ready for use ?
Many thanks,
Michael
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
