Re: Building lucene index using 100 Gb Mobile HardDisk

2007-02-05 Thread John Haxby
maureen tanuwidjaja wrote: Oh is it?I didn't know about that...so Is it means I cant use this Mobile HDD.. Damien McCarthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FAT 32 imposes a lower file size limitation than NTF. Attempts to create files greater that 4Gig on FAT32 will throw error you are seeing. No

Re: Building lucene index using 100 Gb Mobile HardDisk

2007-02-04 Thread Daniel Noll
maureen tanuwidjaja wrote: Oh is it?I didn't know about that...so Is it means I cant use this Mobile HDD.. You can always reformat the hard drive as NTFS. Daniel -- Daniel Noll Nuix Pty Ltd Suite 79, 89 Jones St, Ultimo NSW 2007, AustraliaPh: +61 2 9280 0699 Web: http://nuix.com/

RE: Building lucene index using 100 Gb Mobile HardDisk

2007-02-01 Thread maureen tanuwidjaja
e- From: maureen tanuwidjaja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 February 2007 14:22 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Building lucene index using 100 Gb Mobile HardDisk Dear All, I was indexing 660,000 XML documents.The unoptimized index file was successfully built in about 17 hrs..

RE: Building lucene index using 100 Gb Mobile HardDisk

2007-02-01 Thread Damien McCarthy
lucene index using 100 Gb Mobile HardDisk Dear All, I was indexing 660,000 XML documents.The unoptimized index file was successfully built in about 17 hrs...This index file resides in my D drive which has the free space 38 Gb.This space is insufficient for optimizing the index file --&g

Building lucene index using 100 Gb Mobile HardDisk

2007-02-01 Thread maureen tanuwidjaja
Dear All, I was indexing 660,000 XML documents.The unoptimized index file was successfully built in about 17 hrs...This index file resides in my D drive which has the free space 38 Gb.This space is insufficient for optimizing the index file -->I read Lucene documentation said about its