Super! Thanks for catching this.
Mike
"Bogdan Ghidireac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great, everything runs fine now.. Thank you.
>
> Bogdan
>
> On 11/27/07, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > OK I opened this JIRA issue to track this:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.o
Great, everything runs fine now.. Thank you.
Bogdan
On 11/27/07, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> OK I opened this JIRA issue to track this:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1069
>
> Mike
>
> "Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Woops! You
OK I opened this JIRA issue to track this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1069
Mike
"Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Woops! You are right, this is a silly bug in the CheckIndex tool. It is not
> properly taking into account deletions. I will open an issue
Woops! You are right, this is a silly bug in the CheckIndex tool. It is not
properly taking into account deletions. I will open an issue & fix it.
Thanks for testing & reporting this, and sorry about that.
Mike
"Bogdan Ghidireac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to use the Check
Hi,
I tried to use the CheckIndex tool (the latest svn code) and I was surprised
to notice that all my indexes from production (around 30) are corrupt. This
is highly unlikely because they were running for about one year and I had no
exception during search so far.
One recurring pattern I observe
