In addition, IndexInput.clone must create abother view on the same file,
useable from another thread.
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
Michael McCandless schrieb:
Multiple threads are free to interact with Directory.
But it will be only one thread at
Thank you Mike. This could be documented in Lucene's Directory and stream
classes for others benefit too.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Multiple threads are free to interact with Directory.
>
> But it will be only one thread at a time in
Multiple threads are free to interact with Directory.
But it will be only one thread at a time interacting with a single
instance of IndexInput and IndexOutput.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Dhruv wrote:
> I am trying to implement an in-memory
I am trying to implement an in-memory version of the Directory, IndexInput
and IndexOutput classes, similar to RAMDirectory.
Can someone please point out if there are any concurrency and thread safety
requirements from these classes? Do the users of these classes implement
client side locking or u
