Re: Further refinement of search results - distinguishing hits with exact phrase match from the rest

2010-02-15 Thread Michael McCandless
I don't think Lucene makes this easy, today, out of the box. The scoring process for a boolean query doesn't track which sub-clause had matched. Though, it does track the number of clauses that matched (coord). EG you'd be able to tell that a given hit had both clauses match, vs only 1 (just

Re: Further refinement of search results - distinguishing hits with exact phrase match from the rest

2010-02-15 Thread mark harwood
Re Mike's delegating custom query suggestion - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1999 - Original Message From: Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Mon, 15 February, 2010 10:03:30 Subject: Re: Further refinement of search

Further refinement of search results - distinguishing hits with exact phrase match from the rest

2010-02-14 Thread micmit
I run a query, say, NAME:John Smith^1.5 OR NAME:(Jo* Smith). Once I get the result set, is there an efficient way to identify those hits that match: a) John Smith b) Jo* Smith ---? or perhaps to change the original query somehow ? -- View this message in context: