: Ah, thanks. So since solr-1.2.0 is using
: lucene-*-2007-05-20_00_04-53.jarin its distribution,
: is this why SOLR-261 is still open?
SOLR-261 was left open because it hadn't been verified yet -- I just did
that and resolved the issue against the trunk.
: I thought that maybe it would be a s
Ah, thanks. So since solr-1.2.0 is using
lucene-*-2007-05-20_00_04-53.jarin its distribution,
is this why SOLR-261 is still open?
I thought that maybe it would be a simple drop in replacement, but when I
tossed in
lucene-*-2.3.1.jar to solr, it didn't fix the problem, so maybe something in
solr n
hi Jake, yes it was commited in Lucene - this is visible in the JIRA issue
when if you switch to the "Subversion Commits" tab. where you can also
see the actual diffs that took place.
Best,
Doron
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Jake Mannix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey folks,
> I was wonder
Hey folks,
I was wondering what the status of LUCENE-933 (stop words can cause the
queryparser to end up with no results, due to an e.g. +(the) clause in the
resultant BooleanQuery). According to the tracking bug, it's resolved, and
there's a patch, but where has that patch been applied? I trie
