Yeah, exactly... it seems absolutely no one know Lucandra.
- Mike
aka...@gmail.com
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Jordon Saardchit wrote:
> Hence my reluctance :)
>
> Jordon
>
> On Sep 3, 2010, at 5:44 AM, Michel Nadeau wrote:
>
> > Anyone?
> >
> > - Mike
> > aka...@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > On M
Hence my reluctance :)
Jordon
On Sep 3, 2010, at 5:44 AM, Michel Nadeau wrote:
> Anyone?
>
> - Mike
> aka...@gmail.com
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Jordon Saardchit wrote:
>
>> I also would be thoroughly interested in hearing the viewpoints from any
>> lucandra users. Its a model
Anyone?
- Mike
aka...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Jordon Saardchit wrote:
> I also would be thoroughly interested in hearing the viewpoints from any
> lucandra users. Its a model we've been considering for some time now. Our
> only reluctance is the lack of point of views from
I also would be thoroughly interested in hearing the viewpoints from any
lucandra users. Its a model we've been considering for some time now. Our
only reluctance is the lack of point of views from the community. Good or bad,
i'd love to hear experiences with it.
Jordon
On Aug 23, 2010, at
Hi,
we are currently considering to switch from Lucene + Cassandra to *Lucandra*,
mainly for the following reasons:
* Ability to have many threads writing in the same index at the same time;
* Live results without the need to close/re-open the index reader;
* Easy scaling to many nodes thanks to
