Hi. I am studying Lucene performance and in particular how it benefits from
faster I/O such as SSD and NVMe.
I am using nightlybench for indexing wiki (1K docs) with similar parameters as
used in nightlyBench. (Hardware: Intel Xeon, 2.5GHz, 20 processor ,40 with
hyperthreading, 64G Memory) and s
: Hi. I am studying Lucene performance and in particular how it benefits from
faster I/O such as SSD and NVMe.
: parameters as used in nightlyBench. (Hardware: Intel Xeon, 2.5GHz, 20
: processor ,40 with hyperthreading, 64G Memory) and study indexing speed
...
: I get best performance
AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Anahita Shayesteh-SSI
Subject: Re: Lucene indexing speed on NVMe drive
: Hi. I am studying Lucene performance and in particular how it benefits from
faster I/O such as SSD and NVMe.
: parameters as used in nightlyBench. (Hardware: Intel Xeon, 2.5GHz, 20
: proc
Hyper-threading should help Lucene indexing go faster, when it's not
IO bound ... I found 20 threads (on 12 real cores, 24 with HT) to be
fastest in the nightly benchmark
(http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/indexing.html).
But it's curious you're unable to saturate one of CPU or IO,
