Re: Multiple index performance

2008-08-19 Thread Cyndy
gt; Antony > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://

Re: Multiple index performance

2008-08-19 Thread Erick Erickson
tion? Any recommendation? > > Thanks in advance. > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-index-performance-tp19043404p19043404.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -

Re: Multiple index performance

2008-08-18 Thread Antony Bowesman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Anthony for your response, I did not know about that field. You make your own fields in Lucene, it is not something Lucene gives you. But still I have a problem and it is about privacy. The users are concerned about privacy and so, we thought we could have all

Re: Multiple index performance

2008-08-18 Thread Antony Bowesman
Cyndy wrote: I want to keep user text files indexed separately, I will have about 10,000 users and each user may have about 20,000 short files, and I need to keep privacy. So the idea is to have one folder with the text files and index for each user, so when search will be done, it will be poin

Multiple index performance

2008-08-18 Thread Cyndy
: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-index-performance-tp19043404p19043404.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL