Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting?

2008-10-21 Thread Ganesh
Hello all, I need to maintain multiple db and i don't want to sort on datetime as it is taking huge RAM. I want to sort on indexed order. Using Multisearcher or ParallelMultiSearcher will maintain the index order. If it does then i don't need to merge the indexDB. Regards Ganesh Send inst

Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting?

2008-10-21 Thread Erick Erickson
You say the timestamp sort is taking lots of RAM, which leads me to ask "what resolution are you using and do you need that great a resolution"? As I understand it, sorting is sensitive to the number of unique terms, so if you're storing millisecond timestamps you have a whole lot more terms than

Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting?

2008-10-22 Thread Ganesh
Erick Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:18 PM Subject: Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting? You say the timestamp sort is taking lots of RAM, which leads me to ask "what resolution are you using and do you need that great a resoluti

Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting?

2008-10-22 Thread Paul Smith
On 23/10/2008, at 4:20 PM, Ganesh wrote: My Index DB is having 10 million records and it will grow to 30 million. Currently I am using millisecond timestamp and the RAM cosumption is more. I will change the resolution to minute. I am using 2 searcher objects refreshing each other every min

Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting?

2008-10-23 Thread Ganesh
ltisearcher will maintain index order sorting? On 23/10/2008, at 4:20 PM, Ganesh wrote: My Index DB is having 10 million records and it will grow to 30 million. Currently I am using millisecond timestamp and the RAM cosumption is more. I will change the resolution to minute. I am using 2 s

Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting?

2008-10-23 Thread Ganesh
. Could anyone explain why? Regards Ganesh - Original Message - From: "Ganesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 1:37 PM Subject: Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting? Multisearcher and ParallelMultiSearcher, when requested to sort

Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting?

2008-10-23 Thread Hadi Forghani
3,X > 1,X Y > 4,X Y > 2,X Z > 5,X Z > > But it should be in the order of 0,1,2,3,4,5. Could anyone explain why? > > Regards > Ganesh > > - Original Message - From: "Ganesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, Octobe

Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting?

2008-10-23 Thread Ganesh
esh - Original Message - From: "Hadi Forghani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:25 PM Subject: Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting? because when you want to find X of second index, shoud pass docId=3 to MultiSearcher and MultiSearcher

Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting?

2008-10-23 Thread Ganesh
Any commets are suggestions are greatly appreciated. Regards Ganesh - Original Message - From: "Ganesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:45 PM Subject: Re: Multisearcher will maintain index order sorting? Multisearcher after performing