Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

2011-04-23 Thread Alex vB
s. The term frequency is then used for ranking purposes. At the moment I pick for ranking the highest value from the freq vector which corresponds to the most matching version. Regards Alex - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-uns

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

2011-04-23 Thread Robert Muir
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Alex vB wrote: > > I am a little bit curious about the Lucene 3.0 performance results because > the larger index seems to > work faster?!? I already ran the test several times. Are my results > realistic at all? I thought PForDelta/2 would outperform the standard i

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

2011-04-23 Thread Alex vB
.com/New-codecs-keep-Freq-skip-omit-Pos-tp2849776p284.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

2011-04-22 Thread Alex vB
Wow cool , I will give that a try! Thank you!! Alex -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/New-codecs-keep-Freq-skip-omit-Pos-tp2849776p2852370.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

2011-04-22 Thread Robert Muir
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Alex vB wrote: > I also indexed one time with Lucene 3.0. Are those sizes really completely > the same? > > Standard 4.0 W Freq W Pos       28.1 GB > Standard 4.0 W/O Freq W/O Pos   6.2 GB > Standard 3.0 W Freq W Pos       28.1 GB > Standard 3.0 WO Freq WO Pos    

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

2011-04-22 Thread Robert Muir
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Alex vB wrote: > During indexing I use StandardAnalyzer (StandardFilter, LowerCaseFilter, > StopFilter). > Can I get somewhere more information for Codec creation or is there just > "grubbing" through the code? try the following patch to switch PFOR1 and PFOR2 ov

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

2011-04-22 Thread Alex vB
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/New-codecs-keep-Freq-skip-omit-Pos-tp2849776p2851898.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

2011-04-22 Thread Alex vB
message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/New-codecs-keep-Freq-skip-omit-Pos-tp2849776p2851809.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-use

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

2011-04-21 Thread Robert Muir
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Alex vB wrote: > > PforDelta W Freq W Pos         20.6 GB > PforDelta W/O Freq W/O Pos               1.6 GB > Standard 4.0 W Freq W Pos              28.1 GB > Standard 4.0 W/O Freq W/O Pos    6.2 GB > Pfor W Freq W Pos                         22 GB > Pfor W/O Freq

Re: New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

2011-04-21 Thread Robert Muir
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Alex vB wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I am currently testing several new Lucene 4.0 codec implementations to > compare with an own solution. > The difference is that I am only indexing frequencies and not positions. I > would like to have this for the other codecs.

New codecs keep Freq skip/omit Pos

2011-04-21 Thread Alex vB
-- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/New-codecs-keep-Freq-skip-omit-Pos-tp2849776p2849776.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: