are
> more near the core of Lucene.
> Hope this makes sense,
> Yuval
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Naama Kraus [mailto:naamakr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 9:19 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Overriding Lucene&#x
/slides/Lucene-Forecast-Version-Unicode-Flex-and-Mod_Willnauer&Schindler.pdf
> > > Alternatively, you may use payloads, but they seem like a worse fit.
> > > Good Luck,
> > > Yuval
> > >
> > > ________
> > > Fr
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Overriding Lucene's term weights computation
ok, thanks Yuval. I'll take a look.
Could you (or anyone) please elaborate why payloads "seem like a worse fit"
?
TX, Naama
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Yuval Feinstein wrote:
>
___
> > From: Naama Kraus [naamakr...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:38 PM
> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Overriding Lucene's term weights computation
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a way for an appli
us [naamakr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:38 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Overriding Lucene's term weights computation
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way for an application to index a document along with its "term
> weighted vector&q
uval
From: Naama Kraus [naamakr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:38 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Overriding Lucene's term weights computation
Hi,
Is there a way for an application to index a document along with its "term
w
Hi,
Is there a way for an application to index a document along with its "term
weighted vector" (Lucene's TermFreqVector). I.e., override the term
frequencies computed by Lucene, with an application's computed term weights
(non frequency based) ?
I don't think I want to use Scorer#score() for appl
