Heh. I suppose I'll defer to your judgment. In my mind, the simple
system to make is to just buffer the adds, buffer the deletes - later
apply the adds, apply the deletes (or the reverse). I am sure something
in Solr would have a more sophisticated process, but my guess was about
what the new L
On 3-Aug-07, at 3:27 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
Also, IndexWriter probably buffers better than you would. If you
buffer a delete with IndexWriter and then add a document that would
be removed by that delete right after, when the buffered deletes
are flushed, your latest doc will not be removed
Also, IndexWriter probably buffers better than you would. If you buffer
a delete with IndexWriter and then add a document that would be removed
by that delete right after, when the buffered deletes are flushed, your
latest doc will not be removed. Its unlikely your own buffer system
would work
Andreas Knecht wrote:
> We're considering to use the new IndexWriter.deleteDocuments call rather
> than the IndexReader.delete call. Are there any performance
> improvements that this may provide, other than the benefit of not having
> to switch between readers/writers?
>
> We've looked at LUCENE
Hi,
We're considering to use the new IndexWriter.deleteDocuments call rather
than the IndexReader.delete call. Are there any performance
improvements that this may provide, other than the benefit of not having
to switch between readers/writers?
We've looked at LUCENE-565, but there's no cle
