Thank, using Whitespace Analyzer works, but I don't understand why
StandardAnalyzer does not work if according with the ChineseAnalyzer
deprecation I should use StandardAnalyzer:
@deprecated Use {@link StandardAnalyzer} instead, which has the same
functionality.
Is very annoying.
2012/6/27 Li
in Chinese, there isn't word boundary between words. it writes like:
Iamok. you should tokenize it to I am ok
if you want to search *amo*, you should view I am ok as one token. In
Chinese, fuzzy search is not very useful. even use Standard Analyzer,
it's ok to use boolean query. because Iamok is
最好搜索的Analyzer 和生成index的Analyzer 保持一致
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Paco Avila monk...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank, using Whitespace Analyzer works, but I don't understand why
StandardAnalyzer does not work if according with the ChineseAnalyzer
deprecation I should use StandardAnalyzer:
Thanks for the info.
2012/6/28 Li Li fancye...@gmail.com
in Chinese, there isn't word boundary between words. it writes like:
Iamok. you should tokenize it to I am ok
if you want to search *amo*, you should view I am ok as one token. In
Chinese, fuzzy search is not very useful. even use
Hi there,
I have to index chinese content and I don't get the expected results when
searching. It seems that the WildcardQuery does not work properly with the
chinese characters. See attached sample code.
I store the string 专项信息管理.doc using the StandardAnalyzer and after that
search for 专项信* and
standard analyzer will segment each character into a token, you should use
whitespace analyzer or your own analyzer that can tokenize it as one token
for wildcard search
在 2012-6-27 傍晚6:20，Paco Avila monk...@gmail.com写道：
Hi there,
I have to index chinese content and I don't get the expected
