Re: Question on Lucene Behavior in 4.9 vs 5.4.1

2016-05-05 Thread Jeremy Glesner
Thanks Christoph. I can upgrade, but would prefer not to go through the trouble only to find that my issue was still there. I looked in JIRA and I don't see any other tickets logged for changes to Fuzzy matching. There may be other changes that would affect my situation. But would be curious t

Re: Question on Lucene Behavior in 4.9 vs 5.4.1

2016-05-04 Thread Christoph Läubrich
I recently have had a problem with strange search results in lucene 5.5, upgrading to 6.0 fixed that, so is upgrading to the latest version an option for you? Am 04.05.2016 23:08, schrieb Jeremy Glesner: Thanks to Adrien for responding. I performed the explain on indexSearcher in Lucene 5.4.1,

Re: Question on Lucene Behavior in 4.9 vs 5.4.1

2016-05-04 Thread Jeremy Glesner
Thanks to Adrien for responding. I performed the explain on indexSearcher in Lucene 5.4.1, the results are pasted below for Basti Bosan (the highest ranked result) and Boston (the preferred result). I'm not 100% sure how to interpret this based on (a) lucene's weighting of the term in the document

Re: Question on Lucene Behavior in 4.9 vs 5.4.1

2016-04-22 Thread Adrien Grand
FuzzyQuery scoring was changen in Lucene 5.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-329 Maybe look at the result of IndexSearcher.explain to understand why the "Boston" doc got a lower score than you "Basti Bosan" doc? Le jeu. 21 avr. 2016 à 15:39, Jeremy Glesner a écrit : > Hello, > > I

Question on Lucene Behavior in 4.9 vs 5.4.1

2016-04-21 Thread Jeremy Glesner
Hello, I'm witnessing a change in behavior between Lucene 4.9 and 5.4.1 that I don't quite understand. I'd like to track down what's happening under the hood. I'm working to update the dependencies of an open source geospatial resolution tool ( https://github.com/Berico-Technologies/CLAVIN), which