: >you can't have a boolean query containing only MUST_NOT clauses (which is
: >what (-(FILE:abstract.htm)) is. it matches no documents, so the mandatory
: >qualification on it causes the query to fail for all docs.
:
: This is true for the search queries, but it makes sense in a query
: filter I
Hi
you can't have a boolean query containing only MUST_NOT clauses (which is
what (-(FILE:abstract.htm)) is. it matches no documents, so the mandatory
qualification on it causes the query to fail for all docs.
This is true for the search queries, but it makes sense in a query
filter IMHO. I e
: In my mind this restriction only apply on a query with just a MUST_NOT
: clause and not to a composed query. I've wrong.
right ... it's an issue for any BooleanQuery, regardless of how that query
may be wrapped in other boolean queries.
-Hoss
--
In my mind this restriction only apply on a query with just a MUST_NOT
clause and not to a composed query. I've wrong.
thanks a lot,
Nicolas
: If I search with boolQuery, Lucene doesn't find anything.
: If I modify by hand the query from "+(-(FILE:abstract.htm))
: +(PATH:/bssrs)" to "-(FILE:
: If I search with boolQuery, Lucene doesn't find anything.
: If I modify by hand the query from "+(-(FILE:abstract.htm))
: +(PATH:/bssrs)" to "-(FILE:abstract.htm) +(PATH:/bssrs)", Lucene find
: the correct list of document.
:
: Does somebody know why ?
you can't have a boolean query containing
That worked... thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Michael D. Curtin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 1:04 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: BooleanQuery question
Van Nguyen wrote:
> I just want results that have:
>
> ID: 1234 OR 234
Van Nguyen wrote:
I just want results that have:
ID: 1234 OR 2344 OR 2323
LOCATION: A1
LANGUAGE: ENU
This query returns everything from my index. How would I create a query
that will only return results the must have LOCATION and LANGUAGE and
have only those three IDs.
I think you'll ne
